1997
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.79.960
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonequilibrium Magnetization Dynamics of Nickel [Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 4861 (1997)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
96
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
96
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results showed that after a laser pulse, the magnetization responds within the first picosecond leading to a sharp demagnetization and a much longer remagnetization time. These dynamics have been observed by other experimental groups 5,6 but the theoretical understanding of the dynamics is still limited. Improving this understanding could pave the way for magnetic storage devices with operating speeds much faster than those of present devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The results showed that after a laser pulse, the magnetization responds within the first picosecond leading to a sharp demagnetization and a much longer remagnetization time. These dynamics have been observed by other experimental groups 5,6 but the theoretical understanding of the dynamics is still limited. Improving this understanding could pave the way for magnetic storage devices with operating speeds much faster than those of present devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…It has recently been observed that ferromagnetic nickel may partially demagnetize on time scales much shorter than the spin-lattice relaxation time [1][2][3][4] following excitation by femtosecond optical pulses. The first experimental observations revealed demagnetization times of 260 fs 1 and 280 fs, 2 while a theoretical study suggested an intrinsic time scale for demagnetization of just 10 fs.…”
Section: School Of Physics University Of Exeter Stocker Road Exetementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported that the magnetization of a 22 nm thick film drops rapidly during the first picosecond and reaches its minimum after 2 ps. Recently, by time-resolved second harmonic generation (SHG), Hohlfeld et al [3] found that even when electrons and lattice have not reached a common thermal equilibrium, the classical M (T ) curve can be reproduced for delay times longer than the electron thermalization time of about 280 fs. On the other hand, the transient magnetization reaches its minimum ≈ 50 fs before electron thermalization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the transient magnetization reaches its minimum ≈ 50 fs before electron thermalization. Both groups used polycrystalline Ni but different pulse durations: 60 fs [2] vs 150 fs [3]. Recently even faster spin decays have been observed [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%