2015
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.114.156402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonexistence of the Luttinger-Ward Functional and Misleading Convergence of Skeleton Diagrammatic Series for Hubbard-Like Models

Abstract: The Luttinger-Ward functional Φ [G], which expresses the thermodynamic grand potential in terms of the interacting single-particle Green's function G, is found to be ill-defined for fermionic models with the Hubbard on-site interaction. In particular, we show that the self-energy Σ[G] ∝ δΦ[G]/δG is not a single-valued functional of G: in addition to the physical solution for Σ [G], there exists at least one qualitatively distinct unphysical branch. This result is demonstrated for several models: the Hubbard at… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
203
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 153 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
12
203
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While, as mentioned before, a direct analytical proof of this assumption is not easily feasible for the AL, its validity has been demonstrated in Ref. [30] by explicit numerical calculations following a scheme analogous to the one proposed in Eqs. (26).…”
Section: Atomic Hubbard Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While, as mentioned before, a direct analytical proof of this assumption is not easily feasible for the AL, its validity has been demonstrated in Ref. [30] by explicit numerical calculations following a scheme analogous to the one proposed in Eqs. (26).…”
Section: Atomic Hubbard Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, along the lines of Ref. [30], we rewrite Eq. (15) in two different ways so that they represent iterative schemes for the determination of Σ from a given G (at a fixed value of W ):…”
Section: Impact On Algorithmic Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition to the choice of topologies to be included, the diagrams can be evaluated with bare propagators G 0 or interacting propagators G. If the self-energy is derived from a functional of the self-consistently computed G, the approximation can be shown to satisfy certain conservation laws [30]. In practice, however, bare expansions in terms of G 0 are often found to be more reliable [31,32]. (MBPT approaches which involve both bare and interacting propagators have also been proposed [33], but will not be considered here.…”
Section: B Weak-coupling Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By varying N * and monitoring the convergence of the selfenergy, the accessible parameter regime can be determined and the errors can be controlled. We use an expansion in terms of bare propagators which is typically found to converge towards the correct solution in the weak-coupling regime U 4t, wherever numerically exact benchmarks are available [32,40].…”
Section: Diagrammatic Monte Carlomentioning
confidence: 99%