Molecular Genetics of Recombination
DOI: 10.1007/4735_2006_0210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonhomologous End-Joining: Mechanisms, Conservation and Relationship to Illegitimate Recombination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By comparative genomic analysis, it appears that loss of introns in teleost genes occurs by incremental steps, one or two introns at a time, through a process of homologous recombination between the cDNA and the genomic sequence encoding that cDNA [30,31]. In contrast, the intronless fabp11a gene most likely arose by illegitimate recombination [32] between the fabp11a cDNA and an unrelated region of the medaka genome.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By comparative genomic analysis, it appears that loss of introns in teleost genes occurs by incremental steps, one or two introns at a time, through a process of homologous recombination between the cDNA and the genomic sequence encoding that cDNA [30,31]. In contrast, the intronless fabp11a gene most likely arose by illegitimate recombination [32] between the fabp11a cDNA and an unrelated region of the medaka genome.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Duplicate intron‐containing fabp11 genes emerged in the teleost fishes following the WGD [16–19]. A new intronless fabp11a gene arose by integration of a fabp11a cDNA into another gene by illegitimate recombination [32], co‐opting that gene’s promoter and its regulatory elements. Finally, the intron‐containing fabp11a gene was lost from the genome owing to accumulation of deleterious mutations, as the intronless fabp11a gene maintained the function(s) of the intron‐containing gene during its functional decay.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cipal mechanism for repairing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) in which the two DSB ends are directly rejoined (Wilson 2007). As such, NHEJ is critical for maintaining genome stability.…”
Section: N Onhomologous End Joining (Nhej) Is a Prin-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As opposed to one‐ended breaks, repair of two‐ended breaks can be accomplished by simply ligating them together. This is achieved by the non‐homologous DNA end‐joining pathway (Figure 1B; Lees‐Miller and Meek, 2003; Lieber et al , 2003; Wilson, 2007).…”
Section: Dna End Metabolism By End Joiningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The simplest breaks to be handled by non‐homologous DNA end joining are those with a chemical composition that allows direct ligation. In these cases, joining requires the ‘core’ components of non‐homologous DNA end joining, which include the Ku70/80 heterodimer, the DNA‐dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA–PKcs), XRCC4, XLF, and DNA ligase IV (Wilson, 2007). The Ku70/80 protein complex plays a central role.…”
Section: Dna End Metabolism By End Joiningmentioning
confidence: 99%