Nonhuman Politics and Its Practices

Janicka, Iwona

doi:10.5040/9781350090507.ch-010

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Any serious effort to consider politics and nonhumans together must, therefore, reflect on political practice (cf. Janicka 2017Janicka , 2020. At the same time, I maintain that precisely because of Latour's strong focus on practice, he might be one of the few thinker in the posthumanities, broadly understood, that can fruitfully be brought into dialogue with Rancière and, so doing, with left-wing political thought more generally.…”

Section: Rancière's Critique Of Latourmentioning

confidence: 96%

Who Can Speak? Rancière, Latour and the Question of Articulation

Janicka¹

2020

Humanities

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In recent years, scholars in broadly considered posthumanities have attempted to reconceptualize politics in order to better account for the role of nonhuman entities in political processes. In this context, the article instantiates a dialogue between Jacques Rancière and Bruno Latour on one of the fundamental questions of politics, that is, the question of logos. Even though Latour and Rancière differ considerably in their theoretical and political orientations, each of them revisits the question of ‘who can speak?’ in order to examine the ways in which speechless entities gain a voice, thereby becoming intelligible as political entities. In this article, I confront Rancière’s reservations about nonhumans as political agents, showing how Latour offers pathways beyond Rancière’s apparent bias towards the human, a bias that is, I argue, fundamentally contradictory to the latter’s broader conceptualization of politics as aesthetics. I formulate a Latourian rebuttal of Rancière’s reservations and analyse the utility of Latour’s thought in overcoming Rancière’s limitations. Latour’s reorientation of logos towards the concept of ‘articulation’ makes it possible to evacuate, to some extent, the human exceptionalism from Rancière’s philosophy. Combining Latour with Rancière permits to fundamentally rearticulate the parameters of left-wing thinking about nonhumans.

show abstract

Section: Rancière's Critique Of Latourmentioning

confidence: 96%