The idea that we can affect neural activity via electricity goes back to the late eighteenth century when Luigi Galvani showed that the muscles of dead frog legs twitched when hit by direct current on the nervous system. New techniques, such as transcranial electric stimulation (tES) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), that use electricity to modulate neuronal activity in a less invasive way than electroconvulsive therapy were recently invented. In contrast to imaging techniques, which are only correlational, by means of tES and TMS, it is possible to infer a causal relation between the stimulated brain area and a related cognitive function. This Special Issue is a forum for the exchange of novel hypotheses mainly about how tES enhances (social) cognitive processes. tES modifies brain excitability through weak, electric currents, and it is assumed to be a top-down technique that indirectly modulate subcortical activity through primary network changes in cortical activity.The Special Issue comprises 8 articles with 6 mini reviews, 1 perspective and 1 opinion elaborated by 24 authors from various countries. These contributions present state-of-the art, theory-driven approaches to the study of tES to promote cognition and performance across different fields.Schroeder and Plewnia (2017) present a nice overview of the enhancing effect of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on cognitive processes. This article suggests that the enhancing effects take place via several aspects: suppression of hyperactivity, dysfunctional network activity, noise filtering, state-dependent activity tuning (homeostatic plasticity), and distant disinhibition.Reteig et al. (2017) review 52 tES studies pointing to promising results in enhancing four aspects of attention that have been most extensivelystudiedtargetedtodate:visualsearch,spatialorienting, spatial bias and sustained attention. This article discusses important suggestions for future research aiming to use tDCS as a tool to enhance or test theoretical hypotheses about attention.Civai and Ma (2017) highlight that the enhancement of social norm compliance via brain stimulation should be carefully considered given that benchmark for deciding what is right and what is wrong is not always easy to determine in the social context. Lavazza and Garasic (2017), within a Rawlsian theoretical framework, underline the moral reasons for some forms of regulation of non-clinical use of brain stimulation in order to Bcontainê ventual performance inequalities and consequent discrimination, if these new techniques were to become widespread. review 34 tES studies showing that tDCS and transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) can enhance arithmetic capabilities in adult populations and could be promising tools for deviant performance populations (e.g., dyscalculia, stroke patients, children).