1994
DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199402000-00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive detection of cerebral plasticity in adult human somatosensory cortex

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
70
1
4

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
70
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The decrease in sensory input produced here by upper extremity amputation was followed by an ªinvasionº of the cortical amputation zone by the adjacent face area whose innervation had remained intact, as had been demonstrated previously in monkeys (Jenkins et al 1990;Pons et al 1991;Recanzone et al 1992b,c;Florence and Kaas 1995) and humans (Elbert et al 1994;Yang et al 1994;Flor et al 1995;Knecht et al 1996) In addition, the distance between the cortical representations of the digits (D1 and D5) of the intact hand in amputees was increased compared with the control subjects, suggesting an increase in the representation of the intact hand. This change could be due to an increased importance of sensory stimulation consequent to the increased dependence on that hand imposed by the loss of the amputated hand.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The decrease in sensory input produced here by upper extremity amputation was followed by an ªinvasionº of the cortical amputation zone by the adjacent face area whose innervation had remained intact, as had been demonstrated previously in monkeys (Jenkins et al 1990;Pons et al 1991;Recanzone et al 1992b,c;Florence and Kaas 1995) and humans (Elbert et al 1994;Yang et al 1994;Flor et al 1995;Knecht et al 1996) In addition, the distance between the cortical representations of the digits (D1 and D5) of the intact hand in amputees was increased compared with the control subjects, suggesting an increase in the representation of the intact hand. This change could be due to an increased importance of sensory stimulation consequent to the increased dependence on that hand imposed by the loss of the amputated hand.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The adjacent representation of the face had expanded into the hand and arm areas so that stimulation of the face evoked activity in the area formerly occupied by the representation of hand and digits. Extensive cortical reorganization following somatosensory deafferentation also occurs and persists in humans following upper extremity amputation, as demonstrated by MSI (Elbert et al 1994;Yang et al 1994;Flor et al 1995;Knecht et al 1996). The magnitude of cortical reorganization is strongly associated with the amount of phantom limb pain experienced by the amputees .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Some of the first evidence for adult cortical reorganization came from animal and human studies in which a region of primary somatosensory cortex (S1) was deafferented (deprived of input) by means of amputation (Kalaska and Pomeranz, 1979;Merzenich et al, 1983;Merzenich et al, 1984;Calford and Tweedale, 1988;Pons et al, 1991;Elbert et al, 1994;Yang et al, 1994;Flor et al, 1995). Neurons in the deafferented region began responding to stimuli that normally activated adjacent S1 cortex.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the work on somatosensory plasticity has involved non-human mammals and has primarily made use of electrophysiological methods of receptive field mapping. However, there have also been a number of more recent studies examining the consequences of peripheral manipulations in humans making use of both behavioral and neuroimaging methodologies in investigating the consequences of amputation/deafferentation [6][7][8][9][10], surgical correction of syndactyly [11] and enrichment/differential use [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%