2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0044-8486(02)00135-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Noninvasive, mass marking of fish by immersion in calcein: evaluation of fish size and ultrasound exposure on mark endurance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, fin rays and scales with high concentration of dyes provided good marks (score ≥2), which allows non-lethal detection of marks (Brown et al, 2002;Leips et al, 2001;Frenkel et al, 2002;Honeyfield et al, 2006); removes the effort in preparing otolith (Barker and Mckaye, 2004) and marks were retained for a relatively long time. Much longer retention time in other fluorescent markers have already been reported (Leips et al, 2001;McFarlane and Beamish, 1995).…”
Section: Mark On Fin Rays and Scalesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…In this study, fin rays and scales with high concentration of dyes provided good marks (score ≥2), which allows non-lethal detection of marks (Brown et al, 2002;Leips et al, 2001;Frenkel et al, 2002;Honeyfield et al, 2006); removes the effort in preparing otolith (Barker and Mckaye, 2004) and marks were retained for a relatively long time. Much longer retention time in other fluorescent markers have already been reported (Leips et al, 2001;McFarlane and Beamish, 1995).…”
Section: Mark On Fin Rays and Scalesmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…1C and Fig. S1) (16)(17)(18)(19). Thus both transverse and longitudinal sections through the forming end of the ray almost always include spatially resolved regions of mineralizing bone.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Similar results have been reported by Crook et al [24], Lü et al [26], and Bashey [37], and these studies suggested that this retention period may be even longer. For example, it has been reported that CAL and ARS marks in sagittae can persist for up to 12 months and at least 8 months, respectively [31,42]. Therefore, it appears that mark retention will not be an issue in grass carp marked with CAL or ARS.…”
Section: Mark Retentionmentioning
confidence: 99%