2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2016.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonischemic left ventricular scar and cardiac sudden death in the young

Abstract: Nonischemic left ventricular scar (NLVS) is a pattern of myocardial injury characterized by midventricular and/or subepicardial gadolinium hyperenhancement at cardiac magnetic resonance, in absence of significant coronary artery disease. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of NLVS in juvenile sudden cardiac death and to ascertain its etiology at autopsy. We examined 281 consecutive cases of sudden death of subjects aged 1 to 35 years. NLVS was defined as a thin, gray rim of subepicardial and/or midmyocardial s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
28
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather than an ECG marker of advanced RV disease, low QRS voltages indicate LV involvement (regardless of the RV disease severity) and reflect loss of myocardium/electrical voltages of the LV wall and replacement by electrically inert fibrofatty scar tissue. [54][55][56][57][58] The ECG abnormalities resulting from delayed RV activation/conduction include RBBB (usually incomplete and rarely complete), QRS fragmentation, prolongation of right precordial QRS duration with a delayed S-wave upstroke, terminal activation duration (TAD) > _55 ms, and epsilon waves. The accuracy of the presence of epsilon waves as a diagnostic tool has been questioned since these discrete signals are related to ECG filtering and sampling rate, giving rise to large interobserver variability.…”
Section: Repolarization and Depolarization Electrocardiographic Abnormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rather than an ECG marker of advanced RV disease, low QRS voltages indicate LV involvement (regardless of the RV disease severity) and reflect loss of myocardium/electrical voltages of the LV wall and replacement by electrically inert fibrofatty scar tissue. [54][55][56][57][58] The ECG abnormalities resulting from delayed RV activation/conduction include RBBB (usually incomplete and rarely complete), QRS fragmentation, prolongation of right precordial QRS duration with a delayed S-wave upstroke, terminal activation duration (TAD) > _55 ms, and epsilon waves. The accuracy of the presence of epsilon waves as a diagnostic tool has been questioned since these discrete signals are related to ECG filtering and sampling rate, giving rise to large interobserver variability.…”
Section: Repolarization and Depolarization Electrocardiographic Abnormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distinctive ECG features of LV involvement in ARVC include T-wave inversion in the infero-lateral leads and low QRS voltages (<0.5 mV) in limb leads, which reflect the loss of myocardium and electrical voltages of the LV wall. 55,56 Ventricular tachycardia is characteristically monomorphic, with a RBBB morphology which denotes its origin form the LV. 8,60 The typical LV imaging phenotype is characterized by a ventricular remodelling pattern consisting of mild LV dysfunction and no or mild LV dilatation, in association with a significant amount of subepicardial/mid-myocardial (non-ischaemic) LGE affecting multiple LV segments (mostly the inferolateral wall regions) ( Figure 2).…”
Section: Left-dominant Variants Of Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the 5-year study period, 10,985 non-professional competitive athletes (66% males, median age 15 [13][14][15][16][17][18] years, 97% White) underwent PPE. Of those, 451 (4.1%, 95% CI 3.7%-4.5%) showed positive medical history, pathological physical examination or abnormal baseline ECG.…”
Section: History Physical Examination and Baseline Ecgmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Previous outcome studies provided evidence that the non-ischaemic LV scar may be associated with lifethreatening VA and SCD. [17][18][19][20] In particular, we found in a previous investigation that, during a mean 3-year follow-up, 22% of athletes with non-ischaemic LV scars and VA experienced ICD shock, sustained ventricular tachycardia or SCD; in 5 of 6 cases the event occurred during exercise. 17 In the present study, none of the athletes who received a diagnosis of non-ischaemic LV scar experienced malignant events during follow-up.…”
Section: Underlying Myocardial Substratesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation