2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10665-016-9871-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear behaviour of interacting mid-latitude atmospheric vortices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…e interaction between strong cyclonic vortices and the accompanied secondary circulation structures under various flow conditions requires comprehensive exploration through theoretical analysis, numerical simulation, and laboratory experiments. ey may provide invaluable ingredients for understanding the physics of intense oceanic eddies [33,36] or atmospheric vortices [37] with coherent wave trains [38] and they will be reported elsewhere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e interaction between strong cyclonic vortices and the accompanied secondary circulation structures under various flow conditions requires comprehensive exploration through theoretical analysis, numerical simulation, and laboratory experiments. ey may provide invaluable ingredients for understanding the physics of intense oceanic eddies [33,36] or atmospheric vortices [37] with coherent wave trains [38] and they will be reported elsewhere.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following outlines the derivation of the Dirichlet boundary value problem and the earlier paper by Cosgrove & Forbes (2017) gives a derivation for the corresponding similar Robin boundary value problem. The state variables are given the value one on the boundaries of the δ-plane and the velocity components are zero there.…”
Section: T H E S P E C T R a L S O L U T I O N M E T H O Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown previously by Cosgrove & Forbes (2017) that the results of simulating interacting atmospheric vortices using the f-plane approximation can be misleading due to false reflections off the artificial boundaries, especially when Dirichlet boundary conditions are involved. To overcome this phenomenon, Cosgrove & Forbes (2017) used Robin boundary conditions to absorb and minimize the influence of such reflections. However, using the δ-plane approximation, the numerical solutions obtained using Dirichlet and Robin boundary conditions are virtually identical, indicating that the δ-plane approximation with its quadratic variation is capable of absorbing false reflections.…”
Section: P R E S E N Tat I O N O F R E S U Lt Smentioning
confidence: 99%