2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-007-9317-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear dynamics of idler gear systems

Abstract: This work examines the nonlinear, parametrically excited dynamics of idler gearsets. The two gear tooth meshes provide two interacting parametric excitation sources and two possible tooth separations. The periodic steady state solutions are obtained using analytical and numerical approaches. Asymptotic perturbation analysis gives the solution branches and their stabilities near primary, secondary, and subharmonic resonances. The ratio of mesh stiffness variation to its mean value is the small parameter. The ti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the theoretical friction coefficient is derived from elasto-hydrodynamic lubrication and tribology theory, however several experimental works show that a constant friction coefficient is acceptable for dynamic analysis as indicated in (Liu, 2007;Rebbechi, Oswald, & Townsend, 1996;Velex & Cahouet, 2000). Benedict and Kelley's empirical equation shows that the coefficient of friction can vary between 0.03 and 0.1 (He, Gunda, & Singh, 2007).…”
Section: Friction Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the theoretical friction coefficient is derived from elasto-hydrodynamic lubrication and tribology theory, however several experimental works show that a constant friction coefficient is acceptable for dynamic analysis as indicated in (Liu, 2007;Rebbechi, Oswald, & Townsend, 1996;Velex & Cahouet, 2000). Benedict and Kelley's empirical equation shows that the coefficient of friction can vary between 0.03 and 0.1 (He, Gunda, & Singh, 2007).…”
Section: Friction Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benedict and Kelley's empirical equation shows that the coefficient of friction can vary between 0.03 and 0.1 (He, Gunda, & Singh, 2007). Furthermore the value of 0.1 or even values as high as 0.2 are commonly used in several gear dynamic models as explained by (Liu, 2007). To get meaningful values of μ o , the variation from 0.0 to 0.2 have been used in this study to simulate the Coulomb friction effect.…”
Section: Friction Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are not general and often represent certain lubricants, operating temperatures, speed and load ranges, and surface roughness conditions of roller specimens that might differ from those of the actual gear pair of interest [33]. In general, the theoretical friction coefficient is derived from elasto-hydrodynamic lubrication and tribology theory, however several experimental works show that, a constant friction coefficient is acceptable for dynamic analysis as indicated in [34][35][36]. Benedict and Kelley's empirical equation shows that, the coefficient of friction varies between 0.03 to 0.1 [37], furthermore the value of 0.1 or even values as high as 0.2 are commonly used in several gear dynamic models as explained in [36].…”
Section: Friction Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the theoretical friction coefficient is derived from elasto-hydrodynamic lubrication and tribology theory, however several experimental works show that, a constant friction coefficient is acceptable for dynamic analysis as indicated in [34][35][36]. Benedict and Kelley's empirical equation shows that, the coefficient of friction varies between 0.03 to 0.1 [37], furthermore the value of 0.1 or even values as high as 0.2 are commonly used in several gear dynamic models as explained in [36]. To get meaningful values of μ o , the variation from 0.0 to 0.2 have been used in this study to simulate the Coulomb friction effect.…”
Section: Friction Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bonori et al [6] used this formulation to optimize design parameters while Liu and Parker [7] proved its usefulness performing dynamic simulation of more complex systems. Recently, a dynamic simulation model based on a lumped-parameter formulation was developed by Zhang et al to analyse the vibration modes of two-stage helical planetary gears used in cranes [8], while Dong et al coupled lumped mass modelling and theoretical models for loaded and unloaded tooth contact analysis with the aim of investigating the vibration characteristics of power-split transmissions [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%