2007
DOI: 10.3901/jme.2007.06.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear hysteresis model and control of magnetostrictive micropositioner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed compensator is applied as a feedforward compensator to the actuator can substantially suppress the hysteresis and output asymmetry nonlinearities in the entire frequency range considered in the study. Reference [31] studied the GMM nonlinear compensation problem based on different methods, but only provided general qualitative analysis in terms of iterative compensation and adopted a fixed step size Δu for the iterations. To satisfy the control accuracy requirements, the step size Δu cannot be too large, but very small values will reduce the execution efficiency of the program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed compensator is applied as a feedforward compensator to the actuator can substantially suppress the hysteresis and output asymmetry nonlinearities in the entire frequency range considered in the study. Reference [31] studied the GMM nonlinear compensation problem based on different methods, but only provided general qualitative analysis in terms of iterative compensation and adopted a fixed step size Δu for the iterations. To satisfy the control accuracy requirements, the step size Δu cannot be too large, but very small values will reduce the execution efficiency of the program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig.3 Equivalent magnetic circuit A G , B G andΦ G are cross-sectional area, magnetic flux density and magnetic flux of the GMM rod; A p , B r , Φ p , P p and U p are cross-section, residual magnetic flux density, magnetic flux, permeability, and MMF of permanent magnet; A g , B g andΦ g are cross-sectional area, magnetic flux density and magnetic flux of MRF gap; Φ c , P c and U c are magnetic flux, permeability, and MMF of magnetic flux c; Φ d , P d and U d are magnetic flux, permeability, and MMF of magnetic flux d. So There are relationships based on Kirchhoff's law of magnetic circuit:Φ g =Φ c +Φ G (5) U p +U c = U p +U d =0 (6) Φ p =Φ G +Φ c +Φ l (7) Φ p = P p U p +A p B r (8) Φ c = P c U c (9) Φ d = P d U d(10) There is a relationship calculated form (6) and(7):Φ c =…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%