2017 12th International Scientific and Technical Conference on Computer Sciences and Information Technologies (CSIT) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/stc-csit.2017.8098790
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear inertia weight in particle swarm optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three testing data sets with different parameter combinations were selected to test the generalization ability and robustness of the prediction model. We performed a simulation to compare the accuracy of the proposed method with that of other evolutionary algorithms [17]- [21]. The dataset of flank wear is publicly available at [27].…”
Section: B Flank Wear Prediction Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Three testing data sets with different parameter combinations were selected to test the generalization ability and robustness of the prediction model. We performed a simulation to compare the accuracy of the proposed method with that of other evolutionary algorithms [17]- [21]. The dataset of flank wear is publicly available at [27].…”
Section: B Flank Wear Prediction Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The advantage of the BP algorithm is its fast convergence ability; however, BP might cause the system to fall into local optimal solutions. Hence, evolutionary algorithms, such as differential evolution (DE) [18]- [20], particle swarm optimization (PSO) [21], and artificial bee colony [22], have been proposed to search for global optimal solutions. DE algorithms have the advantages of a simple structure, low computational complexity, and low parameter setting requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PSO algorithm is an evolutionary algorithm proposed by Kennedy and Eberhart that imitates bird foraging behavior through particles. It relies on the memory of the bird's own position and the information exchange mechanism within the swarm, so that the bird can quickly locate the target position [44][45][46]. The PSO algorithm can greatly reduce the possibility of falling into the local optimal solution, and has the characteristics of easy implementation and fast convergence.…”
Section: Neural Network Prediction Model Based On Particle Swarm Opti...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, many other authors use a variety of strategies to dynamically adjust IW, for instance, applying a linear decrease of IW from 0.9 to 0.4 during the first half of optimization, and restarting the cycle in the second half 36 . Other inertia adjustment PSO variants include nonlinear reduction, 37 selective multiple IW, 38 dynamic nonlinear changed IW, 39 nonlinear natural logarithm IW, 40 stability‐based adaptive IW, 41 fuzzy adaptive IW, 42 and many others.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%