2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10846-015-0183-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Model Predictive Formation Control: An Iterative Weighted Tuning Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The works are given in the order of publication (years). All mentioned works contain description of vehicle dynamics or kinematics model (except for [34] where, however, a reference is made to model from another paper), results of simulation and/or empirical research, therefore these information is not included in the table. After analysis of data presented in the table one can notice that:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The works are given in the order of publication (years). All mentioned works contain description of vehicle dynamics or kinematics model (except for [34] where, however, a reference is made to model from another paper), results of simulation and/or empirical research, therefore these information is not included in the table. After analysis of data presented in the table one can notice that:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often model linearization is used in the neighborhood of the operating point, which ultimately boils down to use of algorithms relying on linear model. In contrast, the NMPC uses advanced methods of objective function optimization, which was discussed in the works:[3,7,10,19,28,29,31,34,38,44].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Pioneer 3 simulated model 65 considers white noise in the values of position and velocities that are fed back to the controllers in order to have a more realistic simulation. The values of λ are λ 1 = 5, λ 2 = 3, and λ 3 = 1 for the straight trajectory and λ 1 = 1, λ 2 = 1.5, and λ 3 = 1 for the circularshaped trajectory and they were obtained through the method proposed by Nascimento et al 74 The robot model used in the simulation is that of a Pioneer 3 robot. Fig.…”
Section: Nmpc Example With Differential Drive Mobile Robotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While addressing this problem, the stateof-art methodologies for obstacle avoidance in the context of cooperative target tracking have drawbacks. In [7], [8] obstacle avoidance is imposed as part of the weighted MPC based optimization objective, thereby providing no guaranteed avoidance. In [1] obstacle avoidance is a separate planning module, which modifies the generated optimization trajectory using potential fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. u R k * t (N) = arg min u R k t (0)...u R k t (N) (J DQMPC ) (3) subject to, x R k t (n + 1) ẋ R k t (n + 1) = A x R k t (n) ẋ R k t (n) + B(u R k t (n) + f R k t (n) + g g g), (4) u min ≤ u R k t (n) ≤ u max ,(5)x min ≤ x R k t (n) ≤ x max ,(6)x min ≤ẋ R k t (n) ≤ẋ max(7)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%