2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2020.104415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear model predictive torque control and setpoint computation of induction machines for high performance applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to implement the predictive current control, the machine model should be discretized. Using forward euler discretization (13), it is possible to predict state values of the next sample based on the values of the current sample. Since the α − β-component values of the stator current are of interest, only first two rows of the state and input matrix will be considered.…”
Section: Deriving the Control Algorithm For The Inner Control Loopmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to implement the predictive current control, the machine model should be discretized. Using forward euler discretization (13), it is possible to predict state values of the next sample based on the values of the current sample. Since the α − β-component values of the stator current are of interest, only first two rows of the state and input matrix will be considered.…”
Section: Deriving the Control Algorithm For The Inner Control Loopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lot of papers emerged with the attempts to improve upon the existing induction machine MPC methods. Authors Englert et al developed a method for optimal setpoint calculation for the PTC in [13]. It is known that in PTC, a weighing factor must exist in the cost function in order to penalize torque and flux errors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen from ( 9) and ( 11) that the predicted values of flux linkage and current are predicted by the current ( ) and voltage ( ) measured at the current moment and the observed flux linkage ̂( ) Yes, but due to the one-beat delay in the digital control system [9], [10], the selected voltage vector will not be updated until the next moment. Therefore, the current stator current and stator flux linkage have become ( + 1) and ̂( + 1) respectively.…”
Section: Multi-step Delay Compensationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among many identification algorithms, the identification algorithm based on RASM is favored by people because of 1321 its easy implementation and good stability [1]. Many algorithms has different implementation forms depending on the selected physical quantity, such as q-axis rotor flux model [16], [17], d-axis stator voltage model [18], [19], reactive power model [1], [5], [20], [21], electromagnetic torque model [22]- [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%