2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear models to describe production of fruit in Cucurbita pepo and Capiscum annuum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have focused on the use of these evaluation criteria, namely Dionello et al (2009) who studied models describing pineapple drying curves using R², SDR, and MAPE as selection criteria; Terra et al (2010) who applied R², SDR, and AIC as evaluation criteria to analyze the fitting of Gompertz and Logistic models to data of pygmy date palm fruits; Reis et al (2014) who studied clusters of garlic accessions, and concluded that, based on R², MSE, and MAD, the best-fitting model was the Logistic model; Lúcio et al (2015) who analyzed nonlinear models in the production of pumpkin and bell pepper using R²aj and standard error as evaluation criteria; and Deprá et al (2016) who evaluated logistic models for the growth of creole corn cultivars and of maternal half-sib progeny using R² and MAD to assess goodness of fit. Silveira et al (2012) reported that the greater the number of evaluation criteria applied, the more adequate is the indication of which are the bestfitting models.…”
Section: Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have focused on the use of these evaluation criteria, namely Dionello et al (2009) who studied models describing pineapple drying curves using R², SDR, and MAPE as selection criteria; Terra et al (2010) who applied R², SDR, and AIC as evaluation criteria to analyze the fitting of Gompertz and Logistic models to data of pygmy date palm fruits; Reis et al (2014) who studied clusters of garlic accessions, and concluded that, based on R², MSE, and MAD, the best-fitting model was the Logistic model; Lúcio et al (2015) who analyzed nonlinear models in the production of pumpkin and bell pepper using R²aj and standard error as evaluation criteria; and Deprá et al (2016) who evaluated logistic models for the growth of creole corn cultivars and of maternal half-sib progeny using R² and MAD to assess goodness of fit. Silveira et al (2012) reported that the greater the number of evaluation criteria applied, the more adequate is the indication of which are the bestfitting models.…”
Section: Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The logistic model was selected a priori since it presents lower intrinsic and parametric nonlinearity values when compared with other nonlinear growth models. In addition, the logistic model was selected in other researches with multipleharvested crops (LÚCIO et al, 2015;DIEL et al, 2019;SARI et al, 2018). The logistic model for the cultivars in the E1 and E2 seasons was specified as…”
Section: Statistical Analyzesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For multiple-harvest crops, logistic regression models can efficiently describe fruit production which is the appropriate for crops such as Capsicum annuum, Cucurbita pepo, Solanum melongena, Phaseolus vulgaris and Fragaria ananassa (DIEL et al, 2019;LUCIO et al, 2016;LÚCIO;NUNES;REGO, 2015;SARI, et al, 2018;. For Fragaria ananassa, DIEL et al (2019) modeled the fruit production as a function of STa (accumulated thermal sum) for the logistic, Gompertz and von Bertalanffy models in different parameterizations and concluded that the Logisitic model described fruit production best while the models of Gompertz and von Bertalanffy overestimate the parameter that represent the production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These models have the advantage of having smaller number of parameters, generally with biological interpretation, besides facilitating the estimation of daily growth rates, with the maximum rate occurring on the day of the model curve inflection (Gurgel et al, 2011). According to Lúcio et al (2015) and Sari et al (2019), through the inflection point (IP) it is possible to determine the phenological phases of the crop and its duration.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%