1980
DOI: 10.1016/0362-546x(80)90068-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear Schrödinger evolution equations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
403
0
5

Year Published

1984
1984
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 489 publications
(415 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
7
403
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof relies on some Brezis-Gallouet inequality similar to those that appeared in [2]. After this work was completed, we learned that P. Gérard (see [5]) proved the global well-posedness for these equations, in the cases D = 2 or D = 3, in the energy space [4] for where the author uses similar framework to handle more general nonlinearities and problem in exterior domains.…”
Section: Gallo Has Proved the Following Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The proof relies on some Brezis-Gallouet inequality similar to those that appeared in [2]. After this work was completed, we learned that P. Gérard (see [5]) proved the global well-posedness for these equations, in the cases D = 2 or D = 3, in the energy space [4] for where the author uses similar framework to handle more general nonlinearities and problem in exterior domains.…”
Section: Gallo Has Proved the Following Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…We prove that by the Brézis-Gallouët technique applied to higher order energy with integration by parts, the standard theory developed in [5] and [18] for NLS and half-wave equation with cubic nonlinearity, has an improvement to quartic nonlinearity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…In this paper in fact the authors treat, beside very interesting blow-up results, the Cauchy theory for the half-wave equation with cubic nonlinearity via the classical approach in [5]. We should also notice that in [18] the authors work in H 1 2 (R), while in Theorem 0.2 we work in H 1 (R).A basic tool along the proof of Theorem 0.2 will be the following version of (0.2):Its proof follows by a straightforward adaptation of the argument in [5]. Hence we skip it and we shall make an extensive use of (0.10) without any further comment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, for any T > 0 cf., e.g., [4,10,13]. In contrast, for the critical exponent p * = 2 d , global existence of a solution u of (1.1) is guaranteed only under a smallness condition, elaborated in equation (1.3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%