2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2020.107025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear state-space modeling approaches to real-time autonomous geosteering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to the work in [13,19], in this work a particle filter is used to address the well-log interpretation problem. The states of interest are inclination θ t , azimuth ϕ t , TVD z t , true stratigraphic thickness (TST) of the formation T t , and RSD between the logging tool and the upper formation layer s t of the logging tool at the station t. The RSD is the distance between the wellbore and the formation boundary measured in the direction of the formation layer's TST as shown earlier in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to the work in [13,19], in this work a particle filter is used to address the well-log interpretation problem. The states of interest are inclination θ t , azimuth ϕ t , TVD z t , true stratigraphic thickness (TST) of the formation T t , and RSD between the logging tool and the upper formation layer s t of the logging tool at the station t. The RSD is the distance between the wellbore and the formation boundary measured in the direction of the formation layer's TST as shown earlier in Figure 1.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, it involves monitoring the formation's dip angle and the fault throw (i.e., sudden vertical displacement) at each location along the wellbore. Another example (Figure 1, right) also employs the logging tool's location, but instead of considering the dip angle or fault throw, it utilizes the concept of Relative Stratigraphic Depth (RSD) to represent the location of the formation boundary [13].…”
Section: Bayesian Well-log Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Instead of inferring formation parameters of fixed dimensionality, the authors in [57,58,59] used trans-dimensional MCMC methods to infer parameters of earth models that can have a varied number of layers. Miao et al [60] and Veettil et al [61] proposed to infer well-bore locations from gamma-ray (GR) logging data using Bayesian approaches. In this work, we solve the well-logging inverse problems using resistivity EM data with the GTMCMC algorithm, and compare its results with those obtained from the standard TMCMC method.…”
Section: Inversion Of Ultra-deep Directional Resistivity Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%