2017
DOI: 10.1007/s40430-017-0905-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinear updating method: a review

Abstract: This paper is a survey of the literature about the nonlinear updating process. It is focused on the computation of the difference between the numerical model and the reference data as well as the algorithm uses to find the optimal parameters. In both parts of the nonlinear updating process, the popular approaches are presented. Special emphasis is given to methods based on Volterra series.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 108 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A Bayesian inference so updated the stochastic model over displacement amplitude of the fundamental harmonic component obtained in the function of the Bouc-Wen parameters through a piecewise HBM approach recently presented in the literature [21]. The methodology was proved to be quite efficient in represent the nonlinear behavior of the structure statistically, showing how practical and robust the proper formulation of a simple analytical tool such as HBM can be to identification purposes, even when dealing with more complex nonlinearities than those commonly identified through it in the literature, such as exemplified in the review made by Busseta et al [5].…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A Bayesian inference so updated the stochastic model over displacement amplitude of the fundamental harmonic component obtained in the function of the Bouc-Wen parameters through a piecewise HBM approach recently presented in the literature [21]. The methodology was proved to be quite efficient in represent the nonlinear behavior of the structure statistically, showing how practical and robust the proper formulation of a simple analytical tool such as HBM can be to identification purposes, even when dealing with more complex nonlinearities than those commonly identified through it in the literature, such as exemplified in the review made by Busseta et al [5].…”
Section: Final Remarksmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since the modeling process of the bridge submodel has been described in Chapter 2 (see (19)), it will not be repeated here.…”
Section: Bridge Submodelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the TCV simulation, the accuracy of the bridge FE model has an important influence on the accuracy of the simulation results. However, the FE model is different from the actual structure due to the influence of mesh generation, boundary conditions, and uncertainty of structural physical parameters [19]. erefore, the FE model updating should be carried out to make it as close as possible to the actual structure, so as to conduct the vibration characteristics analysis of train-bridge system more accurately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, a bibliography review of the nonlinear updating methods is exposed by Bussetta et al (2017). Generally, the updating methods are based on the minimisation of an objective function or a metric that represents the difference between the numerical results and the experimental data.…”
Section: Updating Of a Nonlinear Finite Element Model Using Discrete-mentioning
confidence: 99%