2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jngse.2017.07.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlinearity and solution techniques in reservoir simulation: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Continuity equations are categorized as partial differential equations, and they are difficult to solve using an analytic method [ 43 ]. Therefore, the finite difference method was chosen as an appropriate method to solve the problem.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Continuity equations are categorized as partial differential equations, and they are difficult to solve using an analytic method [ 43 ]. Therefore, the finite difference method was chosen as an appropriate method to solve the problem.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the mathematical equations were complex, obtaining an analytical solution was difficult [41]. Here, the control volume finite difference method, which is a numerical method, was applied to obtain a solution, and a block-centered grid was employed as the grid system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the definite conditions were given, it was very difficult to solve the above partial differential equations by analytical methods [49], especially for the 3D model. Therefore, the control volume finite difference method, a numerical method, was proposed to solve the equations, and a block-centered grid was simultaneously employed as the grid system.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%