2006
DOI: 10.1021/ja061776o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlithographic Fabrication of Microfluidic Devices

Abstract: A facile nonlithographic method for expedient fabrication of microfluidic devices of poly(dimethylsiloxane) is described. Positive-relief masters for the molds are directly printed on smooth substrates. For the formation of connecting channels and chambers inside the polymer components of the microfluidic devices, cavity-forming elements are adhered to the surfaces of the masters. Using this nonlithographic approach, we fabricated microfluidic devices for detection of bacterial spores on the basis of enhanceme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
122
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
122
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 While Lago et al 6 introduced a way to circumvent the height limitation of single-layer ink by printing up to four times using a thermal toner transfer method onto a glass substrate, the maximum height obtained with this approach was 25 mm. Vullev et al 7 demonstrated a non-lithographic fabrication approach of microfluidic devices by printing positive-relief masters with a laser-jet printer for detecting bacterial spores; the height of the channels, which is likewise dependent on the height of the ink, is limited to between 5 and 9 mm. To achieve deep channels, McDonald et al 8 introduced the use of solid object printing (SOP) to make PDMS molds in thermoplastics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 While Lago et al 6 introduced a way to circumvent the height limitation of single-layer ink by printing up to four times using a thermal toner transfer method onto a glass substrate, the maximum height obtained with this approach was 25 mm. Vullev et al 7 demonstrated a non-lithographic fabrication approach of microfluidic devices by printing positive-relief masters with a laser-jet printer for detecting bacterial spores; the height of the channels, which is likewise dependent on the height of the ink, is limited to between 5 and 9 mm. To achieve deep channels, McDonald et al 8 introduced the use of solid object printing (SOP) to make PDMS molds in thermoplastics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low reagent and power consumption, cost-efficient fabrication, and relatively short operating time periods are some of the key advantages of microfluidic devices (lFDs) (Dittrich and Manz 2006;Whitesides 2006;Thomas et al 2010b). PDMS is a widely used material for fabricating lFDs (Gong and Wen 2009;Zhou et al 2010;Vullev et al 2006; Thomas et al 2010a). Despite its shortcomings, such as porosity (Li et al 2009;Mehta et al 2009;Chueh et al 2007;Shin et al 2003) and susceptibility to a broad range of organic solvents (Lee et al 2003), PDMS is biocompatible (Belanger and Marois 2001;Zhuang et al 2007) and allows for expedient and facile reproduction of features with nanometer precision that are essential for lFDs (Gates 2005;Cong and Pan 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitations of PAP fabrication is set by the resolution of the printer and properties of the printing materials and substrate [3]. References [4]- [6] used laserjet printers while reference [7] used solid-wax printer for producing microchannels. On the other hand, inkjet printing is still largely unexplored despite its lower cost among different types of printers, having a disadvantage of producing relief features with low height.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%