2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2015.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonlocal structure constrained neighborhood preserving embedding model and its application for fault detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(106 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In many studies, the heat kernel is generally introduced to calculate the weights among the different data points. [ 25,40–44 ] Suppose that two weight matrices ( W L and W G ) take the following general form: WL()i,j={italicexp()xixj2/σL2italicif0.25emxi0.25emitalicand0.25emxj0.25emitalicare0.25emitalicadjacent00emitalicotherwise, WG()i,j={italicexp()xixj2/σG2italicif0.25emxi0.25emitalicand0.25emxj0.25emitalicare0.25emitalicnonadjacent and0.25emij00emitalicotherwise, where σ L and σ G are auxiliary parameters. The adjacency graph determines the adjacent relationships between x i and x j , which can be calculated using ε neighbours and k ‐nearest neighbours.…”
Section: Improved Process Monitoring Based On Nplnlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In many studies, the heat kernel is generally introduced to calculate the weights among the different data points. [ 25,40–44 ] Suppose that two weight matrices ( W L and W G ) take the following general form: WL()i,j={italicexp()xixj2/σL2italicif0.25emxi0.25emitalicand0.25emxj0.25emitalicare0.25emitalicadjacent00emitalicotherwise, WG()i,j={italicexp()xixj2/σG2italicif0.25emxi0.25emitalicand0.25emxj0.25emitalicare0.25emitalicnonadjacent and0.25emij00emitalicotherwise, where σ L and σ G are auxiliary parameters. The adjacency graph determines the adjacent relationships between x i and x j , which can be calculated using ε neighbours and k ‐nearest neighbours.…”
Section: Improved Process Monitoring Based On Nplnlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Section 2.1, it is known that angle δ, which represents the trade‐off between the global and local feature extractions, is dependent on W L and W G and changes with the values of σ L and σ G . However, in traditional methods, [ 25,40–44 ] these two auxiliary parameters are only selected based on experience. Once the weak parameters are selected, the values of the two weight matrices, W L and W G , become unreasonable.…”
Section: Improved Process Monitoring Based On Nplnlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…With improvements in SAR image resolution, detailed information of the image is obvious, and texture features of the building area are more abundant and applied to the information extraction of a high-resolution SAR image. Zhao, GAO, and Kuang [4] used the variation function to calculate the texture features of SAR images and applied the facial recognition and facial clustering, image indexing, and image classification [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. Bao et al presented the supervised NPE for feature extraction, using a class label to define the new distance to find the k nearest neighbors [43].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For convenience, manifolds are deemed the spaces that locally look like some Euclidean space, and the calculus can be conducted on these spaces. Recently, some manifold learning algorithms, such as locality preserving projection (LPP), locally linear embedding (LLE), and local tangent space alignment (LTSA), have been applied to reveal the underlying manifold structure of the process data for complex process monitoring Xie and Shi, 2012;Miao et al, 2015). Among them, LPP is a well-known local structure analysis method that is popular due to its simple extension to new data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To exploit global and local geometric structure information hidden in process data, combined kernel PCA with LPP to extract linear or nonlinear features for complex process monitoring. Considering that maximum variance unfolding (MVU) can reveal global structure of the data via non-local variance information and that neighborhood preserving embedding can refine the local variance information, Miao et al (2015) defined a dualobjective optimization problem that minimizes local scatter and maximizes non-local scatter simultane-ously. Zhang et al (2011) proposed a novel localglobal structure analysis approach for process monitoring in the framework of PCA and LPP.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%