Nonmethane Hydrocarbon Intercomparison Experiment (NOMHICE): Task 4, ambient air

Abstract

[1] The Nonmethane Hydrocarbon Intercomparison Experiment (NOMHICE) was designed to assess the accuracy and comparability of nonmethane hydrocarbon (NMHC) measurements from research groups around the globe. This is being accomplished by conducting a series of intercomparisons, called Tasks, of prepared mixtures or collected ambient air. This paper presents results for an ambient air challenge sample as part of the fourth NOMHICE installment (Task 4). Twenty-three laboratories participated in Task 4, and 30 overall analytical results are compared. The air sample provided a wide dynamic range of mixing ratios (parts per trillion by volume (pptv) to parts per billion by volume (ppbv)) as well as large number of compounds (>100). Coelutions of NMHCs with other volatile organic compounds (VOCs) such as oxygenated VOCs are shown to make the analysis of whole air samples more challenging than for prepared standard mixtures. Individual canisters containing the air sample were prepared and analyzed by the NOMHICE group at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR-NOMHICE), sent to participants for analysis, and reanalyzed upon return to NCAR-NOMHICE. The mixing ratio of propylene increased by 10% (14 pptv) in the canisters with time, and some of the less volatile compounds decreased in the canisters with time; however, the majority of the compounds were stable throughout the experiment. Participants were asked to identify and quantify as many compounds as possible with their analytical techniques and to submit their results to NCAR-NOMHICE scientists. Fiftyfour compounds were chosen for the intercomparison. Eight hundred eighty-three measurements were compared overall; the average of the mean ratios of the participants' results to NCAR-NOMHICE results was 1.03. The participants' results were combined and averaged for each individual NMHC measured and compared to the reference results; thirty-three of the 54 compounds agreed to within ±20% of the reference results. Individual analyses from participant laboratories were compared and ranked with respect to agreement with the reference values; the ranking was reconciled with the analytical procedures employed for each analysis. From this, recommendations were derived for preferred analytical techniques and practice. Recommendations include but are not limited to the following: (1) National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) standards or NIST-traceable standards should be used and, for mass spectrometric analyses, multicomponent NIST-traceable standards should be used; (2) if solid adsorbents are used for preconcentrating NMHCs, extensive tests should be performed to test for artifact formation and compound losses; and (3) for whole air sampling in canisters, subsequent analyses should be performed as soon as is reasonably possible to avoid the potential for compositional changes.

Analysis of non-methane hydrocarbons in air samples collected aboard the CARIBIC passenger aircraft

“…This behavior has been observed by other laboratories measuring NMHC employing similar techniques (i.e. pre-concentration followed by GC-FID analysis) and is considered to be a product of detector and system parameters and configuration (Colman et al, 2001;Apel et al, 2003). Sample mixing ratios are determined from the individual compound response factors, with the exceptions being 3-methylpentane and cyclohexane, which are not in the primary standard.…”

“…Additionally, for each sample meteorological parameters are calculated based on ECMWF re-analyzed data, and 8-day backward and 2-day forward trajectories are calculated with the KNMI trajectory model, TRAJKS (Scheele et al, 1996;van Velthoven, 2009) The experiences of other laboratories measuring NMHC from sampling canisters indicate that care should be taken to minimize the time between sample collection and analysis in order to avoid possible artifacts of storage (e.g. trace gas decomposition and growth of compounds) (Apel et al, 2003;Plass-Dülmer et al, 2006). With few exceptions, CARIBIC samples are analyzed for NMHC within two weeks of collection, and for the majority of flights analysis is conducted within one week.…”

Characterization of trace gases measured over Alberta oil sands mining operations: 76 speciated C<sub>2</sub>–C<sub>10</sub> volatile organic compounds (VOCs), CO<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, CO, NO, NO<sub>2</sub>, NO<sub>y</sub>, O<sub>3</sub> and SO<sub>2</sub>

“…Here we used working standards collected in the Sierra Nevada mountain range. International intercomparison experiments have demonstrated that our analytical procedures consistently yield accurate identification of a wide range of blindly selected hydrocarbons and produce excellent quantitative results (e.g., Apel et al, 1999Apel et al, , 2003. Table 1 shows the limit of detection (LOD) and the measurement precision and accuracy for each VOC.…”

Comparison of aromatic hydrocarbon measurements made by PTR-MS, DOAS and GC-FID during the MCMA 2003 Field Experiment

“…Formal international comparisons between research groups using gas chromatography based systems for the measurement of non-methane hydrocarbons have been reported (Apel et al, 1994(Apel et al, , 1999(Apel et al, , 2003Slemer et al, 2002;Volz-Thomas et al, 2002). These studies demonstrated that different calibration standards and analytical procedures could lead to significant differences between laboratories in the analysis of synthetic mixtures and ambient air samples.…”