1993
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/80.2.373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonparametric estimation of residual variance revisited

Abstract: SUMMARYSeveral difference-based estimators of residual variance are compared for finite sample size. Since the introduction of a rather simple estimator by Gasser, Sroka & JennenSteinmetz (1986) other proposals have been made. Here the one given by Hall, Kay & Titterington (1990) is of particular interest. It minimizes the asymptotic variance. Unfortunately it has severe problems with finite sample bias, and the estimator of Gasser et al. (1986) proves still to be a good choice. A new estimator is introduced, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…where l denotes the difference operator applied l subsequent times (Rice, 1984;Hall et al, 1990;Seifert et al, 1993;Dette et al, 1998). This estimator was introduced in Vrugt et al (2005) and was shown to work well for daily and hourly discharge data.…”
Section: Case Studies: Hydrologic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where l denotes the difference operator applied l subsequent times (Rice, 1984;Hall et al, 1990;Seifert et al, 1993;Dette et al, 1998). This estimator was introduced in Vrugt et al (2005) and was shown to work well for daily and hourly discharge data.…”
Section: Case Studies: Hydrologic Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the estimation of variance σ 2 , usually one fits the regression function m first by smoothing spline or kernel regression (Müller and Stadtmüller 1987;Hall and Carroll 1989;Neumann 1994), and then estimate variance σ 2 from residual sum of squares. However, the regression function estimation depends on the amount of smoothing (Dette et al 1998), which requires knowledge about some unknown quantities such as 1 0 {m (1) (x)} 2 dx (Hall and Marron 1990), 1 0 {m (2) (x)} 2 dx (Buckley et al 1988), and even 1 0 {m (l) (x)} 2 dx where l is a derivative order (Seifert et al 1993;Eubank 1999;Wang 2011). Moreover, few methods are proposed to estimate the amount of smoothness 1 0 {m (l) (x)} 2 dx.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With respect to the Rice-type estimator, Müller and Stadtmüller (1999) proposed the lagged Rice estimator; Müller et al (2003) proposed a covariate-matched U-statistic; Tong and Wang (2005) further improved the lagged Rice estimator via estimating the variance as the intercept in a linear regression model, and the asymptotic optimal rate is discussed in Tong et al (2013), Dai and Tong (2014) proposed a pairwise regression for models with jump discontinuities. As for the Gasser-type estimator, Seifert et al (1993) generalized to a higher-order version, and Du and Schick (2009) proposed a covariate-matched U-statistic. For the differenced estimators above, there exist the following problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of input, state, and structural errors the statistics of the model residual will not necessarily behave in a fashion similar to the statistics of the streamflow measurement error. In this paper, we use an alternative nonparametric approach for estimating the properties of the measurement error in a data series (e.g., Rice 1984;Hall et al 1990;Seifert et al 1993;Dette et al 1998). This method assumes that the measurement errors are random in nature, and involves taking the time difference of the original time series, z t , and estimating the error deviation as…”
Section: Experimental Design and Data Usedmentioning
confidence: 99%