1992
DOI: 10.1109/18.149500
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonparametric identification of Wiener systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
90
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 178 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many authors have studied Wiener system identification under the assumption that the non-linearity is unknown but one-to-one (Brillinger 1970, Pajunen 1985, Hasiewicz 1987, Greblicki 1992, 1997, Westwick and Kearney 1992, Wigren 1994, Westwick and Verhaegen 1996, Bai 1998, Lovera et al 2000. Other methods for Wiener system identification require the non-linearity to be known, invertible, monotonic, odd, even, or require the use of specially designed input sequences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many authors have studied Wiener system identification under the assumption that the non-linearity is unknown but one-to-one (Brillinger 1970, Pajunen 1985, Hasiewicz 1987, Greblicki 1992, 1997, Westwick and Kearney 1992, Wigren 1994, Westwick and Verhaegen 1996, Bai 1998, Lovera et al 2000. Other methods for Wiener system identification require the non-linearity to be known, invertible, monotonic, odd, even, or require the use of specially designed input sequences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods for Wiener system identification require the non-linearity to be known, invertible, differentiable, odd or require specially designed input sequences. In particular, the Wiener identification problem has been considered in Brillinger (1970), Pajunen (1985), Hasiewicz (1987), Greblicki (1992Greblicki ( , 1994Greblicki ( , 1997Greblicki ( , 1998, Westwick and Kearney (1992), Wigren (1994), Westwick and Verhaegen (1996), Bai (1998), and Lovera et al (2000) under the assumption that the non-linearity is unknown but one-to-one. This assumption simplifies the problem considerably since the inverse system can be viewed as a Hammerstein system wherein the input to the nonlinearity is measured.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stegemann et al, 2012Stegemann et al, , 2011 invertible nonlinearity (cf. Greblicki, 1992) (Pintelon and Schoukens, 2001). In comparison with the classical distortion theory described in (Weiner and Spina, 1980) or (Wambacq and Sansen, 1998), the model can be used for EMI induced distortion analysis at nonsignal inputs, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fundamental to the identification and control of the Wiener system is the characterization/representation of the unknown nonlinear static function. Various approaches have been researched including the nonparametric method [7], subspace model identification methods [8], [6], fuzzy modelling [9] and the parametric method [10], [3], [4], [2]. For the parametric method, the unknown nonlinear function is restricted by some parametric representation with a finite number of parameters, and the system identification includes the estimation of the unknown parameters using nonlinear optimization algorithms based on input/output observational data Based on the approximation theory, the polynomial functions are appropriate in approximating the unknown nonlinear static functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%