2011
DOI: 10.1198/jasa.2011.tm10576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonparametric Tests for Homogeneity Based on Non-Bipartite Matching

Abstract: Given a sequence of observations, has a change occurred in the underlying probability distribution with respect to observation order? This problem of detecting change points arises in a variety of applications including health prognostics for mechanical systems, syndromic disease surveillance in geographically dispersed populations, anomaly detection in information networks, and multivariate process control in general. Detecting change points in high-dimensional settings is challenging, and most change-point m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 37 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rafsky (1979, 1981) observe that the power of their single-tree test is enhanced by evaluating successive disjoint low-weight spanning trees. Similarly, Ruth and Koyak (2011) show that ensembles of disjoint lowweight non-bipartite matchings carry significant information regarding whether a distributional change occurs over a sequence of independent observations. A drawback associated with examining collections of such subgraphs is that null distributions are extremely difficult to determine.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rafsky (1979, 1981) observe that the power of their single-tree test is enhanced by evaluating successive disjoint low-weight spanning trees. Similarly, Ruth and Koyak (2011) show that ensembles of disjoint lowweight non-bipartite matchings carry significant information regarding whether a distributional change occurs over a sequence of independent observations. A drawback associated with examining collections of such subgraphs is that null distributions are extremely difficult to determine.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%