1998
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9868.00121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonparametric Validation of Similar Distributions and Assessment of Goodness of Fit

Abstract: In this paper the problem of assessing the similarity of two cumulative distribution functions F and G is considered. An asymptotic test based on an -trimmed version of Mallows distance À F , G between F and G is suggested, thus demonstrating the similarity of F and G within a preassigned À F , G neighbourhood at a controlled type I error rate. The test proposed is applied to the validation of goodness of ®t and for the nonparametric assessment of bioequivalence. It is shown that À F , G can be interpreted as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
82
0
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
82
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…at the plot of the resulting p-values in dependence on the value of ∆ 0 (cf. [35]), which can serve as a valuable diagnostic tool in model checking and in comparing different models.…”
Section: Bootstrap Tests and Some Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…at the plot of the resulting p-values in dependence on the value of ∆ 0 (cf. [35]), which can serve as a valuable diagnostic tool in model checking and in comparing different models.…”
Section: Bootstrap Tests and Some Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This choice of ∆ has some practical appeal [35] and is related to the Wasserstein distance between probability distributions. In the context of goodness-of-fit testing for parametric models in the one sample case, see [16,15] and the references given there.…”
Section: Remark 23mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many applications we are interested in showing that two independent samples arise from similar underlying populations F and G. As pointed out by Munk & Czado (1995) testing the hypothesis H 0 : F = G versus K 0 : F 6 = G is not suitable for the assessment of similarity of populations, although this is common practice. Even when the observed p-value of a test for H 0 is large, this does not allow for a controlled error rate when assessing similarity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even when the observed p-value of a test for H 0 is large, this does not allow for a controlled error rate when assessing similarity. Therefore, Munk & Czado (1995) suggested interval hypotheses tests of the form H : (F; G) > 0 versus K : (F; G) 0 ;…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation