1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf02854878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonpathogenic bacteria associated with potato stems cross-react withCorynebacterium sepedonicum antisera in immunofluorescence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inexpensive, less specific polyclonal antibodies are sometimes used to increase the sensitivity of serological methods. However, this method frequently produces false positive results due to cross-reactivity with other bacteria [47] and cannot be used to detect Cms strains without EPS layers [6,48]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inexpensive, less specific polyclonal antibodies are sometimes used to increase the sensitivity of serological methods. However, this method frequently produces false positive results due to cross-reactivity with other bacteria [47] and cannot be used to detect Cms strains without EPS layers [6,48]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnostic kits are available for some subspecies, but false positive results and limited sensitivity remain problems for serological detection of Cm (Crowley and De Boer 1982;De Boer and Wieczorek 1984;Mills et al 1997;Pastrik 2000). Identification of Cm has also been based on fatty acid methyl ester analysis (FAME).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas immunofluorescence with polyclonal antisera was too nonspecific for accurate identification of a single bacterial pathogen (De Boer 1982, Crowley & De Boer 1982, the monoclonal antibody was highly specific for C. sepedonicum (DeBoer & Wieczorek 1984). With the setup used in this work, positive fluorescing cells could be adequately discriminated from other fluorescence in the video image.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%