2005
DOI: 10.1299/jsmeb.48.75
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonpremixed Flamelet Statistics at Flame Base of Lifted Turbulent Jet Nonpremixed Flames

Abstract: Nonpremixed flamelet statistics at the flame base of lifted turbulent nonpremixed flames are investigated experimentally using a planar temperature Rayleigh scattering method. A methane/hydrogen mixture is supplied from a tube of 3.2 mm I.D. into the surrounding air flow so as to form two lifted turbulent nonpremixed flames having exit velocities of 50 m/s (Re = 4 200) and 80 m/s (Re = 6 700), respectively. Temperature data are related to maximum temperature at several flame positions based on the instantaneou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This data supports the idea that the premixed propagation is what dictates flame stabilization rather than the extinction of the diffusion flame [1], and since some recent experiments are still investigating scalar dissipation as the controlling parameter [20], hybrid approaches may still be viable [10]. A related study by Ahmed and Mastorakos [22] also focuses on ignition and subsequent upstream propagation of lifted flames.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This data supports the idea that the premixed propagation is what dictates flame stabilization rather than the extinction of the diffusion flame [1], and since some recent experiments are still investigating scalar dissipation as the controlling parameter [20], hybrid approaches may still be viable [10]. A related study by Ahmed and Mastorakos [22] also focuses on ignition and subsequent upstream propagation of lifted flames.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In reacting flows D can vary substantially in different regions of the flow owing to its dependence on temperature. Experimental investigations of the behaviour of the statistics of χ include, for example, Namazian, Schefer & Kelly (1988); Gladnick, LaRue & Samuelsen (1990); Boyer & Queiroz (1991) ;Nandula, Brown & Pitz (1994); Everest et al (1995); Chen & Mansour (1996); Buch & Dahm (1998) ;Fielding, Schaffer & Long (1998); Karpetis & Barlow (2002); Tsurikov & Clemens (2002) ;Su & Clemens (2003); Barlow & Karpetis (2004); Noda et al (2005); Wang, Clemens & Varghese (2005); and Markides & Mastorakos (2006). Complementary numerical studies, primarily using direct numerical simulations (DNS), have also verified some of the experimental findings, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Different approaches have been used for this purpose. In experimental studies of hydrocarbon flames, commencement of chemiluminescence of CH * (Su et al 2006), CH PLIF (Watson et al 2000;Hult et al 2005;Noda et al 2005;Lyons et al 2007) or OH PLIF (Boxx et al 2009a,b;Gordon et al 2012) has frequently been used as the flame-base marker. The excited CH * radical is short-lived and thought to mark the instantaneous reaction zone (Su et al 2006).…”
Section: Normalised Flame Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the presentation here is slightly different, we have verified that the final result is the same edge speed as used first by Pantano (2004) to study extinction holes and later by Hawkes et al (2007a,b) to study extinction and reignition, and also by Chakraborty & Mastorakos (2008) to study ignitions. Tiggelen 1966; Kalghatgi 1984;Namazian et al 1988;Miake-Lye & Hammer 1989;Pitts 1989;Takahashi & Schmoll 1991;Schefer et al 1994a,b;Muniz & Mungal 1997;Schefer 1997a,b;Hasselbrink & Mungal 1998;Kelman, Eltobaji & Masri 1998;Schefer & Goix 1998;Tacke et al 1998;Takahashi, John Schmoll & Katta 1998;Brown, Watson & Lyons 1999;Watson et al 1999Watson et al , 2000Watson et al , 2002Watson et al , 2003Han & Mungal 2000;Maurey et al 2000;Baillot & Demare 2002;Mansour 2003Mansour , 2004Noda et al 2005), and therefore there have been numerous questions raised about out-of-plane motion and its potential role in flame stabilisation. Out-of-plane motion of the flame is the consequence of two effects: flow motion and flame propagation.…”
Section: Normalised Flame Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%