Social Entrepreneurship
DOI: 10.4337/9781783474127.00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonprofit commercial revenue: a replacement for declining government grants and private contributions?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
1
1

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
84
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However little is known as to whether nonprofits are increasingly diversifying away from grants and donations. Kerlin and Pollak (2011) do show that there was a gradual trend for the nonprofit sector to become more reliant on commercial revenue from 1982-2000.…”
Section: To What Extent Are Nonprofits Increasingly Adopting Mixed Rementioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However little is known as to whether nonprofits are increasingly diversifying away from grants and donations. Kerlin and Pollak (2011) do show that there was a gradual trend for the nonprofit sector to become more reliant on commercial revenue from 1982-2000.…”
Section: To What Extent Are Nonprofits Increasingly Adopting Mixed Rementioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, commercial revenue consists of sales of goods and services to government or end users, whether directly related to a nonprofits mission, or from unrelated subsidiary activities aimed at raising revenue to subsidise a nonprofits mission; and from membership fees where members receive a direct benefit from their subscriptions. Donative revenue consists of grants and donations, and may be derived from individuals or from organisations whether nonprofit, public or private (Kerlin and Pollak, 2011;Weisbrod, 1998). Commercial and donative revenue have relatively low covariance.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this context, we can consider firms as one of the key SENPO stakeholders. Given that SENPOs can ultimately benefit from having a close SA relationship with firms (Andreasen 1996;Kerlin and Pollak 2011;Liu and Ko 2012), the SA relationshipbuilding motive represents a SENPO's long-term, forwardthinking assessment of costs and benefits related to a SA relationship. The SA benefits-exploiting motive, on the other hand, represents a SENPO's desire to extract benefits from firms.…”
Section: The Moderating Effects Of Sa Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, political and economic conditions, such as the introduction of new public management (Liebschutz, 1992), or the availability of grant funding (Kerlin & Pollak, 2011;, may serve as the external drivers for adopting social venture business models.…”
Section: Social Entrepreneurship and The Transformation Of Non-profitmentioning
confidence: 99%