2019
DOI: 10.1139/as-2018-0024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonrandom territory occupancy by nesting Gyrfalcons (Falco rusticolus)

Abstract: We know little regarding how specific aspects of habitat influence spatial variation in site occupancy by Arctic wildlife, yet this information is fundamental to effective conservation. To address this information gap, we assessed occupancy of 84 Gyrfalcon (Falco rusticolus Linnaeus, 1758) breeding territories observed annually between 2004 and 2013 in western Alaska. In line with the theory of population regulation by site dependence, we asked whether Gyrfalcons exhibited a nonrandom pattern of site selection… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Observed frequencies correspond to the number of burrows occupied for 1 to 7 years, respectively. We then tested whether frequencies of observed occupancy differed from expected ones using a Fisher’s exact test (as in Sergio & Newton, 2003 ; Pagán, Martínez & Calvo, 2009 ; Anderson et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Observed frequencies correspond to the number of burrows occupied for 1 to 7 years, respectively. We then tested whether frequencies of observed occupancy differed from expected ones using a Fisher’s exact test (as in Sergio & Newton, 2003 ; Pagán, Martínez & Calvo, 2009 ; Anderson et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Territories (i.e. nest sites and their surrounding areas) were delineated by a set of decision rules following Anderson et al (2019).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Arnold [36] therefore argued for the use of 85% confidence intervals when interpreting the results of models selection performed using AIC. To allow for inference using both Arnold's [36] recommendation and traditionally-used 95% confidence intervals, some studies interpret those instances where 85% or 95% confidence intervals exclude zero as weak and strong evidence, respectively [37][38][39].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%