2019
DOI: 10.3390/en12112099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonsingular Terminal Sliding Mode Control Based on Binary Particle Swarm Optimization for DC–AC Converters

Abstract: This paper proposes an improved feedback algorithm by binary particle swarm optimization (BPSO)-based nonsingular terminal sliding mode control (NTSMC) for DC–AC converters. The NTSMC can create limited system state convergence time and allow singularity avoidance. The BPSO is capable of finding the global best solution in real-world application, thus optimizing NTSMC parameters during digital implementation. The association of NTSMC and BPSO extends the design of classical terminal sliding mode to converge to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 47 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The training data and the iteration period are also guaranteed to be constant. The Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm (PSO) [40], Beetle Antennae Search algorithm (BAS) [41], Sparrow Search algorithm (SSA) [42], and MVO-optimized SVM are used with the same image feature parameters and time delay compensation, respectively, and the prediction effect is finally observed using the same set of test data. Since optimization algorithms are generally strongly stochastic, ten sets of tests are performed for each algorithm, and the Wilcoxon sign rank test [43] is performed between the RMSEs of the prediction results of the three comparison algorithms and the RMSEs of the MVO, respectively, to prove the optimization effectiveness of the MVO algorithm.…”
Section: Model Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The training data and the iteration period are also guaranteed to be constant. The Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm (PSO) [40], Beetle Antennae Search algorithm (BAS) [41], Sparrow Search algorithm (SSA) [42], and MVO-optimized SVM are used with the same image feature parameters and time delay compensation, respectively, and the prediction effect is finally observed using the same set of test data. Since optimization algorithms are generally strongly stochastic, ten sets of tests are performed for each algorithm, and the Wilcoxon sign rank test [43] is performed between the RMSEs of the prediction results of the three comparison algorithms and the RMSEs of the MVO, respectively, to prove the optimization effectiveness of the MVO algorithm.…”
Section: Model Test Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%