2004
DOI: 10.1016/s1474-6670(17)31330-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonsmooth Lyapunov functions and discontinuous Carathéodory systems

Abstract: Differential equations with discontinuous righthand side and solutions intended in Carathéodory sense are considered. For these systems sufficient conditions which guarantee both Lyapunov stability and asymptotic stability in terms of nonsmooth Lyapunov functions are given. An invariance principle is also proven.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is convex and differentiable. By Proposition 2 and using the result in (Bacciotti & Ceragioli, 2004), we can conclude that any saddle point is Lyapunov stable. Recall that f (x) has a locally Lipschitz continuous gradient, hence the uniqueness of the Carathéodory solution to (3) can be guaranteed.…”
Section: Convergence Analysismentioning
confidence: 76%
“…is convex and differentiable. By Proposition 2 and using the result in (Bacciotti & Ceragioli, 2004), we can conclude that any saddle point is Lyapunov stable. Recall that f (x) has a locally Lipschitz continuous gradient, hence the uniqueness of the Carathéodory solution to (3) can be guaranteed.…”
Section: Convergence Analysismentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The contradiction follows since (27) implies that δ(t) = 0 for all t ∈ (0, t 1 ) due to δ(0) = 0 by construction.…”
Section: When B Is Lower Semicontinuous and C Is Genericmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This subsection gives a brief overview of several fundamental concepts from discontinuous systems theory that are relevant to this paper. The reader is referred to [19]- [22] for more detailed information.…”
Section: Review Of Discontinuous Systems Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where I min (x N ) denotes the indices j such that (e j ) T x N = x Nj = m(x N ). By Definition 8, the set of indices N j such that x Nj = m(x N ) is precisely S m (x N ), which by substitution into (28) yields (22). As a final note, observe that since m(•) is locally Lipschitz by Lemma 2, by the Dilation Rule [19] we can derive ∂(−m(x N )) = ∂((−1)m(x N )) = −(∂m(x N )).…”
Section: Proof Of Lemmamentioning
confidence: 99%