2013
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.87.032122
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonsteady relaxation and critical exponents at the depinning transition

Abstract: We study the nonsteady relaxation of a driven one-dimensional elastic interface at the depinning transition by extensive numerical simulations concurrently implemented on graphics processing units. We compute the timedependent velocity and roughness as the interface relaxes from a flat initial configuration at the thermodynamic random-manifold critical force. Above a first, nonuniversal microscopic time regime, we find a nontrivial long crossover towards the nonsteady macroscopic critical regime. This "mesosco… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

10
75
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
(155 reference statements)
10
75
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This geometrical crossover is compatible with the exponent crossover in the clusters' size distribution and supports the idea of these objects being depinning-like above a scale L opt . The robustness of this conclusion is confirmed by the study of the random field (RF) disorder case, which belongs to a different universality class at equilibrium but shares the same exponents as RB at the depinning transition [19,37,45] (see Supplemental Material [29]). …”
Section: 147208 (2017) P H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T E R Smentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This geometrical crossover is compatible with the exponent crossover in the clusters' size distribution and supports the idea of these objects being depinning-like above a scale L opt . The robustness of this conclusion is confirmed by the study of the random field (RF) disorder case, which belongs to a different universality class at equilibrium but shares the same exponents as RB at the depinning transition [19,37,45] (see Supplemental Material [29]). …”
Section: 147208 (2017) P H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T E R Smentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The figure clearly shows a crossover length scale 1=q c ∼ L opt ∼ f −ν eq that separates short scales (large q) displaying an equilibrium roughness exponent ζ eq ¼ 2=3 from large scales (small q) displaying a depinning roughness ζ dep ≈ 1.25, in agreement with Refs. [43] and [44,45], respectively. This geometrical crossover is compatible with the exponent crossover in the clusters' size distribution and supports the idea of these objects being depinning-like above a scale L opt .…”
Section: 147208 (2017) P H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T E R Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much more is known about the depinning transition: it is a dynamical critical point characterized by two independent exponents related to avalanche extension and duration (26,27). These exponents have been computed perturbatively with the functional renormalization group (28)(29)(30) and evaluated numerically with high precision (31,32). The comparison between these two phenomena has led to the proposition that the yielding transition is in the universality class of mean-field depinning (33,34).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been theoretical efforts with the quenched Edwards-Wilkinson (QEW) equation and the Monte Carlo simulation, to understand the depinning phase transition of the domain-wall motion [15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. The QEW equation is a simple phenomenological model, where a domain wall is considered to be an elastic string, and detailed microscopic structures and interactions of the materials are not concerned.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the transition point in a magnetic thin film was estimated, with the static exponent β as input [23]. On the other hand, the non-stationary dynamic approach looks efficient in tackling the dynamic phase transitions, since the measurements are carried out in the short-time regime of the dynamic evolution [18,19]. The domain-wall motion in a magnetic nanowire was analyzed based on the LLG equation, and a dynamic scaling behavior was observed [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%