2006
DOI: 10.1080/10417940500503506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonverbal Expressions of Liking and Disliking in Initial Interaction: Encoding and Decoding Perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study demonstrates that in comparing FTF communication and VMC, with the exception of speech rate and gaze aversion, these cues do not explain why individuals are attracted to one another, at least not in an open conversation in which people have to get to know each other. This is in contrast with ample research that highlights the importance of nonverbal cues in relationship initiation and development (e.g., Babin, 2013; Burgoon et al, 1999; Ray & Floyd, 2006). However, a recent study by Ta, Babcock, and Ickes (2016), that also examined nonverbal behavior in initial interactions, found that nonverbal behaviors like smiling, gaze, and head nods did not impact the outcomes of the interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The present study demonstrates that in comparing FTF communication and VMC, with the exception of speech rate and gaze aversion, these cues do not explain why individuals are attracted to one another, at least not in an open conversation in which people have to get to know each other. This is in contrast with ample research that highlights the importance of nonverbal cues in relationship initiation and development (e.g., Babin, 2013; Burgoon et al, 1999; Ray & Floyd, 2006). However, a recent study by Ta, Babcock, and Ickes (2016), that also examined nonverbal behavior in initial interactions, found that nonverbal behaviors like smiling, gaze, and head nods did not impact the outcomes of the interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Pitch variation was measured by taking the average variance of the total pitch and was measured in semitones (Boersma, 2004). More specifically, an average (statistical mean) was calculated for pitch, with the distribution about the mean (slope) indicating pitch variation (Ray & Floyd, 2006). Vocal expressiveness in the form of increased vocal pitch variation has been studied before as a measure of communicators’ positive evaluations of one another (e.g., Coker & Burgoon, 1987; Ray & Floyd, 2006).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People who like Poppy more, do not move their head away from screen a lot. This result is also related to findings on likeness in human-human interaction, showing how people show more direct eye contact to liked partner [24].…”
Section: Nonverbal Cues and Interaction Experiencementioning
confidence: 65%
“…Moreover, to improve prediction of experience additional nonverbal features are considered to be exported: to improve prediction of likeness e.g. eye shifts and eye contact could be useful [24], and to improve quality of interaction overlapped speech segments could be significant. Instead of using self-reported personality scores as inputs of our regression models, we plan to build computational models which predict personality from audio-visual data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation