2014
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01323
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonverbal synchrony and affect in dyadic interactions

Abstract: In an experiment on dyadic social interaction, we invited participants to verbal interactions in cooperative, competitive, and ‘fun task’ conditions. We focused on the link between interactants’ affectivity and their nonverbal synchrony, and explored which further variables contributed to affectivity: interactants’ personality traits, sex, and the prescribed interaction tasks. Nonverbal synchrony was quantified by the coordination of interactants’ body movement, using an automated video-analysis algorithm (mot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

19
264
4
5

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 267 publications
(292 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
19
264
4
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, these results are in line with investigations conducted within the experimental contexts of dyadic conversations and psychotherapy settings. These studies reveal that interpersonal coordination patterns are sensitive to the qualities of relationships, such as affect, linking, familiarity and rapport (Grahe and Bernieri, 1999; Nagaoka et al, 2007; Nagaoka and Komori, 2008; Ramseyer and Tschacher, 2011; Paxton and Dale, 2013a; Tschacher et al, 2014). Our findings indicate that interpersonal coordination patterns are also sensitive to another quality of relationships: the trust between interacting people.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, these results are in line with investigations conducted within the experimental contexts of dyadic conversations and psychotherapy settings. These studies reveal that interpersonal coordination patterns are sensitive to the qualities of relationships, such as affect, linking, familiarity and rapport (Grahe and Bernieri, 1999; Nagaoka et al, 2007; Nagaoka and Komori, 2008; Ramseyer and Tschacher, 2011; Paxton and Dale, 2013a; Tschacher et al, 2014). Our findings indicate that interpersonal coordination patterns are also sensitive to another quality of relationships: the trust between interacting people.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Streeck et al 2011;Tschacher et al 2014;Konvalinka et al 2011;Abney et al 2014). These coordination patterns are part of how individual SM schemes are enacted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the early stage of nonverbal research, generating time-series movement data or coding behaviors has been resource intensive, or even painstaking, which hindered the theoretical and/or practical development of (nonverbal) behavioral research on a group interaction. Some recent studies began to utilize automated techniques to generate time-series movement data [11]- [15]. These novel techniques could reduce the cost of conducting nonverbal research, which will enable us to obtain a better understanding of small group interaction from the perspective of body movement and nonverbal behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coding behaviors is time-consuming and painstaking in itself and requires establishing reliability among coders. To address this problem, some recent studies have utilized automated techniques to generate time-series movement data; they use a depth sensor, Kinect (Microsoft) [11], or employ video-tracking techniques [12]- [15]. Behavioral data acquired by these techniques would be less costly as well as highly reliable.…”
Section: Evaluating Synchrony: Wavelet Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%