2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevfluids.5.063301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nonwetting droplet oscillation and displacement by viscoelastic fluids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To describe the impact of the polymer viscoelastic effect on the microscopic oil displacement effect more accurately, scholars worldwide have used different methods and theories to study the viscoelasticity of polymers [ 26 , 27 , 28 ]. The elastic effect of a compound solution is mainly investigated through experiments that have attracted substantial attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To describe the impact of the polymer viscoelastic effect on the microscopic oil displacement effect more accurately, scholars worldwide have used different methods and theories to study the viscoelasticity of polymers [ 26 , 27 , 28 ]. The elastic effect of a compound solution is mainly investigated through experiments that have attracted substantial attention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observed residual fluid redistribution can be related to the flow field fluctuation or ganglia oscillation during viscoelastic flow as demonstrated in 2D micromodel experiments (Clarke et al., 2015) and by pore‐scale simulation in a pore‐throat geometry (Xie et al., 2020). The correlation of neighboring pores (e.g., the pore spacing) may contribute to the ganglion redistribution and mobilization within and between pores, by forming unstable eddies in the corners of the pore bodies under unstable flow with proper pore spacing (Browne et al., 2020a).…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Periodic oil droplet oscillation was observed when oil was displaced by viscoelastic polymer solutions in a contraction‐expansion single channel geometry, which was hypothesized to contribute to residual oil saturation reduction (Qi, 2018). Pore‐scale, lattice Boltzmann simulations also showed that residual droplets can be oscillating as the flow streamlines become chaotic and form vortices that may finally recover the droplet (Xie et al., 2020). Residual ganglia fluctuation and mobilization caused by viscoelastic displacing fluids were observed in micromodels with a two‐dimensional (2D) pore‐network (Clarke et al., 2016; Mitchell et al., 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common approach to handling the polymer interaction with the flow at a macroscopic scale is to represent the polymer contribution to the stress tensor by means of a closed-form, "constitutive" equation; thus, e.g., the work of Yue et al [20][21][22] on drop deformation and complex two-phase flow using a diffuse-interface method and constitutive modeling; in [23], Pillapakkam employed an LS method to study rising bubbles in viscoelastic media, while Foteinopoulou and Laso [24] used a Phan-Thien--Tanner model together with an elliptic mesh-deformation algorithm to investigate bubble oscillation; Castillo et al proposed an LS method with a pressure-enriched FE space to study the two-fluid flow problem along with a Giesekus model for the polymeric liquid [25]; Fraggedakis et al [26] characterized the critical volume of a bubble rising in a viscoelastic fluid using an FEM-based method and the exponential Phan-Thien and Tanner model; using a coupled LS-VOF ("VOSET") method, Wang et al [27] studied drag reduction in cavity flow; Xie et al [28] focused on droplet oscillation under a Maxwell model using lattice Boltzmann techniques. In contrast to constitutive modeling, the "micro-macro" approach [29] tackles the polymer-flow interaction using stochastic and Brownian Dynamics (BD) simulations [30][31][32][33] to retrieve the polymer stress tensor from the internal configurations of the polymer particles advected by the flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 27 ] studied drag reduction in cavity flow; Xie et al. [ 28 ] focused on droplet oscillation under a Maxwell model using lattice Boltzmann techniques. In contrast to constitutive modeling, the “micro-macro” approach [ 29 ] tackles the polymer-flow interaction using stochastic and Brownian Dynamics (BD) simulations [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 ] to retrieve the polymer stress tensor from the internal configurations of the polymer particles advected by the flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%