2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12859-017-1927-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Norgal: extraction and de novo assembly of mitochondrial DNA from whole-genome sequencing data

Abstract: BackgroundWhole-genome sequencing (WGS) projects provide short read nucleotide sequences from nuclear and possibly organelle DNA depending on the source of origin. Mitochondrial DNA is present in animals and fungi, while plants contain DNA from both mitochondria and chloroplasts. Current techniques for separating organelle reads from nuclear reads in WGS data require full reference or partial seed sequences for assembling.ResultsNorgal (de Novo ORGAneLle extractor) avoids this requirement by identifying a high… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A plethora of mitochondrial assembly tools are available, but these generally rely on gDNA or Sanger-derived reads, rather than those sourced from RNA-seq experiments. Programs such as Norgal (Al-Nakeeb, Petersen, & Sicheritz-Pontén, 2017), MitoBIM (Hahn, Bachmann, & Chevreux, 2013) and NOVOPlasty (Dierckxsens, Mardulyn, & Smits, 2016) have proven useful at recovering mitogenome assemblies, particularly when the sequence of a closely related species is available for use as a map for assembly. Increasingly sophisticated tools are available for using gDNA for assembly (Schomaker-Bastos & Prosdocimi, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A plethora of mitochondrial assembly tools are available, but these generally rely on gDNA or Sanger-derived reads, rather than those sourced from RNA-seq experiments. Programs such as Norgal (Al-Nakeeb, Petersen, & Sicheritz-Pontén, 2017), MitoBIM (Hahn, Bachmann, & Chevreux, 2013) and NOVOPlasty (Dierckxsens, Mardulyn, & Smits, 2016) have proven useful at recovering mitogenome assemblies, particularly when the sequence of a closely related species is available for use as a map for assembly. Increasingly sophisticated tools are available for using gDNA for assembly (Schomaker-Bastos & Prosdocimi, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed unsupervised quality trimming on raw reads using UrQt (Modolo & Lerat, ) and removed mitochondrial DNA using Norgal (Al‐Nakeeb, Petersen, & Sicheritz‐Pontén, ). We used dnaPipeTE (Goubert et al, ) to estimate TEs in the LC‐WGS data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mitochondrial DNA can be experimentally separated from the nuclear DNA and sequenced independently but such protocols are laborious [6]. More commonly, the mitogenomes are assembled from Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) data, which consists of reads generated from both the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mitochondrial DNA can be experimentally separated from the nuclear DNA and sequenced independently but such protocols are laborious [6]. More commonly, the mitogenomes are assembled from Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) data, which consists of reads generated from both the nuclear and mitochondrial genomes [6]. Unfortunately, assembling WGS data with standard de novo assemblers often fails to generate high quality mitochondrial genome sequences due to the large difference in copy number (and hence sequencing depth) between the mitochondrial and nuclear genomes [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation