2014
DOI: 10.3171/2013.11.jns131320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal dimensions of the posterior pituitary bright spot on magnetic resonance imaging

Abstract: A n area of T1 hyperintensity is normally observed in the posterior part of the sella turcica on MR images of the brain. This phenomenon, often referred to as the pituitary bright spot (PBS), is thought to result from the T1-shortening effect of stored vasopressin in the posterior lobe of the pituitary 1,12 and is observed in 100% of children 15,17 and in 52% to 100% of adults 5,6,8,19,22 without pituitary disease. The PBS may be absent in up to 48% of normal subjects, more often in older patients.5,23 Individ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Apart from pathognomonic signs of known pathologies (as in the case of twins with tuberous sclerosis32), IFs described in the present study included possible signs of pathologies requiring future diagnostic steps (such as the absence of a posterior pituitary ‘bright spot’, which could also depend on the patient's hydration status33), and a heterogeneous group of other anomalies with a still undefined clinical significance. In this grey zone, the personal experience of the neuroradiologist, the clinical characteristics of the patient and the management options would define whether an IF would or would not be noted, described, communicated and followed up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Apart from pathognomonic signs of known pathologies (as in the case of twins with tuberous sclerosis32), IFs described in the present study included possible signs of pathologies requiring future diagnostic steps (such as the absence of a posterior pituitary ‘bright spot’, which could also depend on the patient's hydration status33), and a heterogeneous group of other anomalies with a still undefined clinical significance. In this grey zone, the personal experience of the neuroradiologist, the clinical characteristics of the patient and the management options would define whether an IF would or would not be noted, described, communicated and followed up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Despite an absence of posterior bright spot in MRI, the patient had no sign and symptom of diabetes insipidus. The absence of posterior bright spot in MRI was reported in about 0 to 25 % of normal subjects [ 37 , 38 ]. However, our patient had anterior pituitary dysfunction with mass and enlarged stalk; hence we suspected that some degree neurohypophyseal inflammation existed without causing gross disturbance in vasopressin secretion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence and location of the posterior pituitary bright spot on precontrast T1-weighted sequence MRI, which is thought to represent the vasopressin storage at the posterior lobe 1 and is expected to be present in most patients, 2 was reported pre-and postoperatively.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%