1969
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(69)80206-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normal inner canthal and outer orbital dimensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
63
2
1

Year Published

1974
1974
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
7
63
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…34 The present data also closely approximate anthropometric data from birth to 36 months of age. 9,21,24 The present measurements also conform to traditional definitions of balanced facial proportion, as determined by the rule of facial fifths, stating that the IC difference should be one-third of the distance between lateral canthal distances. Our normative data analysis result falls within the accepted balanced facial proportions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…34 The present data also closely approximate anthropometric data from birth to 36 months of age. 9,21,24 The present measurements also conform to traditional definitions of balanced facial proportion, as determined by the rule of facial fifths, stating that the IC difference should be one-third of the distance between lateral canthal distances. Our normative data analysis result falls within the accepted balanced facial proportions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The largest proportion of anthropometric data applies to adults 4,9,17,18,[22][23][24][25]30,31,36 and to a lesser extent to the pediatric population. 9,13,16,18,19,21,27,30,36 There are relatively few data available for children younger than 3 years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inner canthal distance varies among ethnic groups. Norms are available for American Africans [Murphy and Laskin, 1990], Chinese [Wu et al, 2000], and Caucasians [Laestadius et al, 1969;Feingold and Bossert, 1974;Merlob et al, 1984;Evereklioglu et al, 2001]. In the presence of an Epicanthal fold, ascertainment of inner canthal distance can be difficult.…”
Section: Telecanthusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The philtrum measured 1.5 cm ([ 2 SD above the mean) [20]. Specific facial feature measurements performed included the outer canthal distance [ [15]. No evidence of cleft palate was found.…”
Section: Case Reportmentioning
confidence: 99%