2006
DOI: 10.1080/13501760500452665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normative by nature? The role of coherence in justifying the EU's external human rights policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the broader picture of EU security policies reveals that there are substantial inconsistencies in the different issues relating to the southern Mediterranean as well as in the EU non-proliferation policies beyond that region. At first glance, this would seem to confirm earlier research results that have shown that the EU is only a normative power when it comes to certain issues (see Lerch & Schwellnus, 2006). However, it is not clear how narrow such an issue area can be in order to continue to recognise the EU as a normative power.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…However, the broader picture of EU security policies reveals that there are substantial inconsistencies in the different issues relating to the southern Mediterranean as well as in the EU non-proliferation policies beyond that region. At first glance, this would seem to confirm earlier research results that have shown that the EU is only a normative power when it comes to certain issues (see Lerch & Schwellnus, 2006). However, it is not clear how narrow such an issue area can be in order to continue to recognise the EU as a normative power.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…To capture the distinction between these types of justifi cation and to operationalize corresponding discursive frames, the theoretical approach relies on the theoretical distinction between pragmatic, ethical-political, and moral types of discourse. This distinction originates from the theory of communicative action developed by Jürgen Habermas and has been used in numerous contributions to research about the discursive dimension of European politics (Habermas 1993;Sjursen 2002Sjursen , 2006aVerney 2006;Lerch and Schwellnus 2006;Ecker-Ehrhardt 2007, cp. also framing approaches based on this distinction such as Helbling et al 2010, pp.…”
Section: Adapting the Standard Model To The Analysis Of Discursive Eumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Hillion argues that the discrepancy between internal and external practices of the EU with regard to the fundamental rights including the human rights could damage the EU's credibility (Hillion 2013). In a similar vein, Lerch and Schwellnus entail the incoherence between internal and external approaches of the EU on the issue of "minority protection" and conclude that the incoherence damages the EU's normative power in this field (Lerch & Schwellnus 2006).…”
Section: Eu's Human Rights Policymentioning
confidence: 99%