2016
DOI: 10.1159/000445799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Normative Data for the Spanish Version of the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III

Abstract: Background: Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination III (ACE-III) is a cognitive test that has been validated for the diagnosis of cognitive disorders. The aim of this study was to provide normative data for the ACE-III for age, education and gender. Methods: The Spanish version of the ACE-III was administered to a group of 273 healthy subjects in a multicenter study in Spain. Correlation and determination coefficients for age, education and gender were estimated. The overlapping interval strategy and linear regre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
26
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
26
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our control group was highly educated, with 70% of participants reporting more than 12 years of education, compared to 28% reported in the general Australian adult population over 65 years of age (ABS, 2012), and demonstrated significantly higher years of education than the dementia group. This is relevant as positive correlations between ACE-III performance and education have been reported (Jubb & Evans, 2015;Matías-Guiu et al, 2016;Qassem et al, 2015). To this point, it is possible that our highly educated control group inflated the specificity and positive predictive values in Study 2 and, therefore, false positives could occur when clinicians use our revised recommended lower bound cutoff ACE-III score of 84/100 (compared with 82) in healthy individuals with less than 12 years of education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Our control group was highly educated, with 70% of participants reporting more than 12 years of education, compared to 28% reported in the general Australian adult population over 65 years of age (ABS, 2012), and demonstrated significantly higher years of education than the dementia group. This is relevant as positive correlations between ACE-III performance and education have been reported (Jubb & Evans, 2015;Matías-Guiu et al, 2016;Qassem et al, 2015). To this point, it is possible that our highly educated control group inflated the specificity and positive predictive values in Study 2 and, therefore, false positives could occur when clinicians use our revised recommended lower bound cutoff ACE-III score of 84/100 (compared with 82) in healthy individuals with less than 12 years of education.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Normative data are available for all of these tests for our specific setting, except for the RUDAS [24,26,29,30]. Raw data of the ACE-III, MMSE, MIS, and MoCA were adjusted for age and education, following the procedure specified for each test, and calculating scaled scores in the case of the ACE-III and of the MoCA and corrected scores in the case of the MMSE and of the MIS [24,26,29,30].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These tasks may be particularly useful discriminating between normal and impaired cognitive abilities [6][7][8]. Therefore, verbal fluency tasks have been incorporated in screening tools designed to detect cognitive deficits such as the Addenbrooke's Cognitive Assessment (ACE) [9,10], the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) [11,12] or the Edinburgh Cognitive Assessment (ECAS) [13]. Verbal fluency tests have been used in a wide range of neurological diseases such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) [14], neurodegeneration coursing with movement disorders [15,16], multiple sclerosis [17] and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%