1967
DOI: 10.1093/forestry/40.2.129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Norway or Sitka Spruce?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the vari-of Sitka spruce, while it attained 79.2% in Czechia and 81.8% in Slovakia. Similar results are documented, for example, by MacDonald (1979). The production potential of Sitka spruce over Norway spruce corresponds to its range of introduction.…”
Section: Other Aspects Of Sitka Spruce Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the vari-of Sitka spruce, while it attained 79.2% in Czechia and 81.8% in Slovakia. Similar results are documented, for example, by MacDonald (1979). The production potential of Sitka spruce over Norway spruce corresponds to its range of introduction.…”
Section: Other Aspects Of Sitka Spruce Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Sitka spruce is not an invasive tree species (Buriánek 2019). Its litterfall is comparable to that of Norway spruce (MacDonald 1979) and its more noticeable introduction in Europe is expected to occur mainly in coastal areas with sufficient precipitation (Moore et al 2012;Worrell & Malcolm 1990a, 1990b. In Czechia, the introduction of Sitka spruce into forestry practice is not yet anticipated, from a legislative viewpoint (Beran & Šindelář 1996).…”
Section: Other Aspects Of Sitka Spruce Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Southern provenances, such as Washington and Oregon, have been found to be susceptible to autumn frost damage in comparison to Queen Charlotte Islands [11], and although the incidence of frost is predicted to decline in the future, sufficient risks remain to continue with Queen Charlotte Islands as the preferred option [2]. Sitka spruce, in common with most spruce species, requires a relatively high soil moisture status for good growth with an annual precipitation typically around 1000 mm or greater [12]. Sitka spruce can grow reasonably well with an annual rainfall of as low a 700-800 mm [13], but this would require consistent moisture availability particularly during the growing season and this cannot be guaranteed under predicted changes in the patterns of rainfall.…”
Section: Geographic Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%