Norwegian Waste-to-Energy: Climate change, circular economy and carbon capture and storage

Abstract

Recently, the European Commission has adopted a Circular Economy package. In addition, climate change is regarded as a major global challenge, and the de-carbonization of the energy sector requires a massive transformation that involves an increase of renewable shares in the energy mix and the incorporation of carbon capture and storage (CCS) processes. Given all this strong new momentum, what will the Norwegian waste-to-energy (WtE) look like in a decade? What threats and opportunities are foreseen? In an attempt to answer these questions, this study combines process-based life-cycle assessment with analysis of the overall energy and material balances, mathematical optimization and cost assessment in four scenarios: (1) the current situation of the Norwegian WtE sector, (2) the implications of the circular economy, (3) the addition of CCS on the current WtE system and (4) a landfill scenario. Except for climate change, the CCS scenario performs worse than the WtE scenario. The energy recovering scenarios perform better than the recycling scenario for (1) freshwater eutrophication and human toxicity potentials due to secondary waste streams and (2) ozone depletion potential due to the additional fossil fuel used in the recycling processes. The inclusion of the near-term climate forcers decreases the climate change impacts by 1% to 13% due to a net cooling mainly induced by NOx. Circular economy may actually give the WtE system the opportunity to strengthen and expand its role towards new or little developed value chains such as secondary raw materials production and valorization of new waste streams occurring in material recycling. Keywords 1. Waste-to-Energy (WtE) 2. Life-cycle assessment (LCA) 3. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) 4. Circular economy 5. Climate change 6. Near-term climate forcers

The Circular Model in Disposal with Municipal Waste. A Case Study of Slovakia

“…Other authors [7] state that the inclusion of environmental impacts can alter waste allocation patterns. Life cycle assessment is commonly applied to identify waste management and treatment systems with minimum environmental impacts [4,[8][9][10]. In [11], impacts of different waste separation and treatment approaches were assessed as an extension of previous techno-economic analysis [12][13][14].…”

A Systematic Literature Network Analysis of Existing Themes and Emerging Research Trends in Circular Economy

“…• Topic 9 explores sustainable development and its variables. Examples include [91] studying the essence, significance and inter-relationship of the concepts "environmental sciences", "sustainable development" and "CE"; [92] exploring the state of Waste-to-Energy in Norway over the next decade along with opportunities and barriers it may face, by considering climate change, CE and carbon capture and storage. • Topic 10 assesses possibilities for China to reach a factor 10 improvement in resource productivity [28].…”

Indoor air NO2 depollution by photocatalysis – comparing reactor and experimental chamber results

“…vitrification), has been recently depicted as the preferred option in a CE perspective [11]. A life-cycle assessment study, developed in a recent work, also highlighted that a WtE scenario would perform better than a recycling scenario from several points of view, thanks to the reduced secondary waste streams (which might increase eutrophication and human toxicity potentials) and to the lower use of fossil fuels with respect to recycling processes [12]. Conversely, if considered as completely separated scenarios, higher impacts are expected from the point of view of GHG emissions with respect to recycling, but those can be minimised if synergies between the two scenarios are pursued in an integrated waste management perspective.…”