2019
DOI: 10.2514/1.a34277
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nose-Tip Bluntness Effects on Transition at Hypersonic Speeds

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
3
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…First, as could already be seen in the results of figure 7, at the higher altitude the maximum value reached by is larger: the value reached at m at altitude km is , which corresponds to an equivalent -factor (Paredes et al. 2019) Such -factor values are typically associated with laminar–turbulent transition of stationary crossflow vortices in the incompressible regime (Bippes 1999) and are certainly considered sufficiently high to lead the laminar flow to transition. In the present analysis, algebraically-growing perturbations are demonstrated to also reach through the alternative non-modal linear instability mechanism that potentially can be responsible for transition; we will return to the question of the associated structures, quantified as linear optimal perturbations, in what follows.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…First, as could already be seen in the results of figure 7, at the higher altitude the maximum value reached by is larger: the value reached at m at altitude km is , which corresponds to an equivalent -factor (Paredes et al. 2019) Such -factor values are typically associated with laminar–turbulent transition of stationary crossflow vortices in the incompressible regime (Bippes 1999) and are certainly considered sufficiently high to lead the laminar flow to transition. In the present analysis, algebraically-growing perturbations are demonstrated to also reach through the alternative non-modal linear instability mechanism that potentially can be responsible for transition; we will return to the question of the associated structures, quantified as linear optimal perturbations, in what follows.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…原因造成了转捩, 也有人猜测是瞬态增长、头部粗糙 度或二者共同的结果 [27] . 虽然高超声速钝头体边界层转捩的机理还有待探 索, 但实际飞行器通常都是钝头体, 飞行器设计时迫切 需要预测转捩位置.…”
Section: 有人认为线性稳定性理论已经失效 可能是别的未知unclassified
“…The second kind of factor influencing hypersonic boundary layer receptivity is wall disturbances, including blow-suction disturbances [ 15 ], wall deformation [ 16 ], local heating/cooling on the wall [ 17 ], and nose-tip bluntness [ 18 , 19 ]. The effect of roughness elements on the hypersonic boundary layer receptivity mechanism has been researched.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%