2020
DOI: 10.1636/0161-8202-48.1.84
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Not all spider silks are antimicrobial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2019) inoculated several types of bacteria directly on silk from the spiders Nephila pilipes , Hippasa holmerae, and Cyrtophora moluccensis but found no evidence for inhibition. Alicea-Serrano et al. (2020) assessed AMA of dragline silk of the spider Latrodectus hesperus in an aqueous Escherichia coli cell culture and found no evidence for antimicrobial properties, and Szymkowiak et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…(2019) inoculated several types of bacteria directly on silk from the spiders Nephila pilipes , Hippasa holmerae, and Cyrtophora moluccensis but found no evidence for inhibition. Alicea-Serrano et al. (2020) assessed AMA of dragline silk of the spider Latrodectus hesperus in an aqueous Escherichia coli cell culture and found no evidence for antimicrobial properties, and Szymkowiak et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decade, a range of studies have investigated antimicrobial properties of spider silk; however, results are conflicting with some reporting antimicrobial activity (AMA) ( Al-Kalifawi and Kadem, 2017 ; Amaley et al., 2014 ; Keiser et al., 2015 ; Roozbahani et al., 2014 ; Tahir et al., 2017 ; Wright and Goodacre, 2012 ; Phartale et al, 2019 ; Deshmukh and Pansare, 2019 ), and others not ( Zhang et al., 2019 ; Zortéa and Fischer, 2009 ; Babczynska et al., 2019 ; Alicea-Serrano et al., 2020 ; Szymkowiak et al., 2020 ). To assess the antimicrobial properties of spider silk in the light of contradictory evidence, we conducted a systematic test of AMA of different silk types from seven species covering the spider phylogeny.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Microbial interaction differs depending on the spider silk used and must be evaluated individually for all spider silks [ 241 ]. Although one study showed increased bacterial adhesion and growth in natural spider silk [ 242 ], several other studies indicated that selected spider silks could be microbe repellent [ 243 , 244 , 245 , 246 , 247 , 248 ].…”
Section: Biological Effects On Spider Silk Coatingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, one study reported increased bacterial growth on spider silk webs of Linothele fallax and Linothele megatheloides and discussed that spider silk proteins may serve as nutrients for various microbes [177], whereas other studies provided clear evidence that spider silks of the species Tegenaria domestica, Nephila pilipes, Hippasa holmerae, and Cyrtophora moluccensis are microbe-repellent [131,136]. More species have been studied in other reports, and as one result thereof it is clear that microbial repellence is not a general trait in spider silks [178]. One way to characterize this issue is through the analysis of genetically engineered silk proteins, allowing for a precise control of the design and modifications of the underlying amino acid sequence motifs and the structure-property relationships of tailored silk materials.…”
Section: Antimicrobial Silk-based Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%