2014
DOI: 10.12968/eyed.2014.16.4.25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Not really wild things

Abstract: We take a look at the benefits for children of rough and tumble play, and the place it has in healthy child development, in order to inform your setting's approach on whether to allow, tolerate or ban it.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In his attempt to arrive at 'thing theory', BillBrownsuggeststhattheobjectsofeverydaylifearenotonlyconstitutedbyconsumerdesiresandaffections,butalsobytheinevitabilityof obsolescence.Hewritesabout'abasicdisjunction,ahumanconditionin whichthingsinevitablyseemtoolate-belated,infact,becausewewant things to come before ideas, before theory, before the word, whereas theyseemtopersistincomingafter:asthealternativetoideas,thelimit totheory,victimsoftheword'. 49 AccordingtoBrown,theonlywayfora thingtoescapebelatednessistomovefromeverydaylifeintotherealmof art,whereitwouldrecaptureanaffectivepower.ASurrealistreadymade orClaesOldenburg'sPop-art'sculptures'arenot'deadcommodities',like theirobsolescenteveryday-lifeprototypes,but'livingworks'thatinspire theviewertoreflectuponthemeaningofthingsandtheirfunctions.Thus, inBrown'sexample,Oldenburg's1999Typewriter Eraser ofshinychrome possessesthepower'todramatizethegenerationaldivideandtostage(to melodramatize,even)thequestionofobsolescence'.Hethengeneralises: 'Releasedfromthebondofbeingequipment,sustainedoutsidetheirreversibilityoftechnologicalhistory,theobjectbecomessomethingelse.' 50 ConsideringBrown'sargumentalongwithRancière'sconceptofthe aestheticregimeofarts,IsuggestthatSovietdesignersaspiredtorelease the object from the doom of obsolescence by transcending the 'basic disjunction'betweenideasandthingsandbetweenartandeverydaylife.…”
Section: Up-to-date Materialitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his attempt to arrive at 'thing theory', BillBrownsuggeststhattheobjectsofeverydaylifearenotonlyconstitutedbyconsumerdesiresandaffections,butalsobytheinevitabilityof obsolescence.Hewritesabout'abasicdisjunction,ahumanconditionin whichthingsinevitablyseemtoolate-belated,infact,becausewewant things to come before ideas, before theory, before the word, whereas theyseemtopersistincomingafter:asthealternativetoideas,thelimit totheory,victimsoftheword'. 49 AccordingtoBrown,theonlywayfora thingtoescapebelatednessistomovefromeverydaylifeintotherealmof art,whereitwouldrecaptureanaffectivepower.ASurrealistreadymade orClaesOldenburg'sPop-art'sculptures'arenot'deadcommodities',like theirobsolescenteveryday-lifeprototypes,but'livingworks'thatinspire theviewertoreflectuponthemeaningofthingsandtheirfunctions.Thus, inBrown'sexample,Oldenburg's1999Typewriter Eraser ofshinychrome possessesthepower'todramatizethegenerationaldivideandtostage(to melodramatize,even)thequestionofobsolescence'.Hethengeneralises: 'Releasedfromthebondofbeingequipment,sustainedoutsidetheirreversibilityoftechnologicalhistory,theobjectbecomessomethingelse.' 50 ConsideringBrown'sargumentalongwithRancière'sconceptofthe aestheticregimeofarts,IsuggestthatSovietdesignersaspiredtorelease the object from the doom of obsolescence by transcending the 'basic disjunction'betweenideasandthingsandbetweenartandeverydaylife.…”
Section: Up-to-date Materialitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%