2012
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sts148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Not too big, not too small: the dark haloes of the dwarf spheroidals in the Milky Way

Abstract: We present a new analysis of the Aquarius simulations done in combination with a semi-analytic galaxy formation model. Our goal is to establish whether the subhalos present in ΛCDM simulations of Milky Way-like systems could host the dwarf spheroidal (dSph) satellites of our Galaxy. Our analysis shows that, contrary to what has been assumed in most previous work, the mass profiles of subhalos are generally not well fit by NFW models but that Einasto profiles are preferred. We find that for shape parameters α =… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
118
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(103 reference statements)
10
118
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we note that the slightly lighter dark matter halo estimated here could lessen tension in hierarchical structure formation in the ΛCDM cosmological paradigm imposed by the so-called missing satellite and too big to fail problems (e.g. Springel et al 2008;Vera-Ciro et al 2013).…”
Section: Dark Matter Halomentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Finally, we note that the slightly lighter dark matter halo estimated here could lessen tension in hierarchical structure formation in the ΛCDM cosmological paradigm imposed by the so-called missing satellite and too big to fail problems (e.g. Springel et al 2008;Vera-Ciro et al 2013).…”
Section: Dark Matter Halomentioning
confidence: 74%
“…We note that the Einasto parameter α could vary for different subhaloes (Vera-Ciro et al 2013), and that r max cannot be measured as accurately as V max , especially for lower-mass subhaloes. To see any potential change in the final result due to inaccurate measurements of subhalo profiles, we simply set r max of each subhalo to be 0.5, 1 and 2 times its current value and carry out the same lensing calculations.…”
Section: Subhalo Density Profilesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Vera-Ciro et al (2012) suggest this problem does not occur if the DM sub-haloes have Einasto rather than NFW density profiles. suggest this problem does not occur if the MW DM halo is less massive than about 2 Â 10 12 M } .…”
Section: Curvature and Homogeneity (1980)mentioning
confidence: 96%