2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.poetic.2015.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Not winging it at Hooters: Conventions for producing a cultural object of sexual fantasy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Up until now, network analysis that traditionally examines concrete structures of social ties, paradoxically, has not considered how these affect the ways individuals utilize physical objects, which are no less concrete. Qualitative micro-perspectives have covered more ground in empirical investigation of materiality (Berns, 2016;Craig, 2011;Griswold et al, 2013;Jarness, 2015;Maisonneuve, 2001;Newton-Francis and Young, 2015). Using ethnographic data they argued that the relations between material things comprise the texture of materiality just like inter-personal ties constitute the texture of the social and hence should not be neglected, and even that materiality has its own structuring logic (Callon et al, 1986;Latour, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up until now, network analysis that traditionally examines concrete structures of social ties, paradoxically, has not considered how these affect the ways individuals utilize physical objects, which are no less concrete. Qualitative micro-perspectives have covered more ground in empirical investigation of materiality (Berns, 2016;Craig, 2011;Griswold et al, 2013;Jarness, 2015;Maisonneuve, 2001;Newton-Francis and Young, 2015). Using ethnographic data they argued that the relations between material things comprise the texture of materiality just like inter-personal ties constitute the texture of the social and hence should not be neglected, and even that materiality has its own structuring logic (Callon et al, 1986;Latour, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Becker (2008, p. 29), people do not produce artworks totally from scratch, but rather rely on conventions-"earlier agreements now become customary"-to collaborate with each other and invoke emotional and aesthetic responses in the audience. These conventions are not only technical, but also gendered, both reflecting and constituting our understandings of gender (Mears 2010;Newton-Francis and Young 2015). Indeed, the general templates my respondents identified resonate with both sociological studies of gender double standards in interaction, where women and girls are expected to be more modest than men and boys (K. A.…”
Section: Cosplayers and Body Movements: Poses And Facial Expressionsmentioning
confidence: 69%