1978
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.24.16.1753
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Note—A New Approach to Urban Modelling

Abstract: This note describes a different approach to urban modelling, resulting in a new, more general form of model. The model can be used for prediction, prescription, explanation, or evaluation; or to distinguish between the objectives of individuals, the planning authority, and the community. It is utility maximizing, and also entropy maximizing, and includes diversity of activities in zones. It relates land use and transport decisions and allows dispersal of urban activities to be analysed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model is a nonlinear programming model that allocates activities to zones on the basis of maximum utility or welfare for the community. In addition, it was developed in the period of reevaluation of modeling techniques and later of resource constraints on urban energy and growth (Brotchie 1978).…”
Section: Current Practice and Frontiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The model is a nonlinear programming model that allocates activities to zones on the basis of maximum utility or welfare for the community. In addition, it was developed in the period of reevaluation of modeling techniques and later of resource constraints on urban energy and growth (Brotchie 1978).…”
Section: Current Practice and Frontiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third generation of modeling focused on the development of solutions for specific domain problems, and, as a result, could only be apprehended by the modeler and highly specialized users well trained over a long period. A good example of a model of the third generation is Brotchie’s model (Brotchie 1978). This marks an important period during which computational capabilities, availability of data and expertise in the different scientific areas started to catch up with developments in other scientific areas.…”
Section: Current Practice and Frontiersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The land use design problem (LDP), referred to in the literature, is a mathematical programming model for generating alternative types, sizes, or location of land use plans. Numerous LDPs have been developed for different scenarios; for example, comprehensive land use planning was discussed in Bammi et al (1976), Bammi and Bammi (1979), Barber (1976), Brotchie (1978), Brotchie et al (1980), Diamond and Wright (1989), Dokmeci (1993), Gilbert et al (1985) and Gordon and MacReynolds (1974); integrated planning of land use and networks in Los (1978Los ( , 1979, Lundqvist (1973), Feng and Lin (1999), and Lin and Feng (2003); land use expansion planning in Ridgley and Giambelluca (1992); urban renewal of transit station areas in Feng and Tsai (1988); and integrated planning of transportation and resource usage in Feng et al (1989). Feng and Chang (1993) and Kaneko and Fukuda (1999) developed LDP to maximize transit system ridership, but focused on economic efficiency and ignored the other two aspects of sustainability: living environment and social equity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most studies regarding layout problems merely concentrate on one with the other fixed. For example, Bammi et al (1976), Bammi and Bammi (1979), Barber (1976), Brotchie (1978), Brotchie et al (1980), Dokmeci et al (1993), Gordon and MacReynolds (1974), and Ridgley and Giambelluca (1992) studied the land use design problem (LDP), under a given transport system. Janson and Husaini (1987), LeBlanc (1975), Mackinnon and Hodgson (1970), Maganti and Wong (1984), Poorzahedy and Turnquist (1982), and Xiong and Schneider (1995) investigated the network design problem (NDP) under a given land use distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%