1972
DOI: 10.1007/bf01684467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Note on the flameless atomic absorption response of mercury without added reducing agent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1975
1975
1976
1976

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The signal was about 20% as large as that observed in the presence of the reducing agents. These observations cannot be explained by volatility of HgCl2 as suggested by previous workers (11,12) for several reasons. Data to support these reasons are presented in Table I.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The signal was about 20% as large as that observed in the presence of the reducing agents. These observations cannot be explained by volatility of HgCl2 as suggested by previous workers (11,12) for several reasons. Data to support these reasons are presented in Table I.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Formation of HgCU2-in the presence of excess chloride was thought to stop the loss. Gutenmann and Lisk (12) reported a response from mercury in the Hatch and Ott procedure without adding the reducing agent. They suggest that the mercury was vaporized as HgCl2 which was then photolytically decomposed in the absorption cell to yield atomic mercury.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%